Thanks for the birthday message :-)
Hi, Nick! I fear there is a problem with your talk page. When I got an Email that your talk page was changed and followed the path, I landed on that site: User talk:Nick O - which does not exist - and not on Nick O'Demus. I thought I should tell you. 17:30, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
That's the link I followed: See "http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Nick_O%27Demus?s=wldiff&diff=0&oldid=696665" for all changes since your last visit. I got the mail because I enabled: "Email me when... ...a page I'm following is changed" in my preferences. You're an admin, so I am always interested in news and have the "Follow button" activated. Perhaps that explains and helps. 19:48, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
I do accept the nomination.21:37, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome! :) and i'll certainly read the pages and policies you told me to.
Varun1996 15:15, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
Not really sure how posting a completely non-factual-based theory is vandalism, but whatever. I'm going to creepypasta. Lighten up bromigo. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peter Bison (talk • contribs).
Hi, Nick! Two people, one thought! I wanted to put the deletion tag on Becky Graham and when I wanted to save I read that you were quicker. And we have both the same reason: FANON. Great!!! 18:07, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Nick! Thank you for Merlin's beard and your nice words. That's great. I love this Wiki, otherwise I would not have done so much. And I hope I can do a lot more in the future.
But I have one question. Perhaps you can help me. Do you know something about the Copyright when uploading photos? I have not uploaded already, because I am never sure when it's allowed and when not. It would be a great help when you would know something about this and would tell me. Seeing forward. 18:23, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Be my guest, I don't mind it at all. Oh, and it's great you asked Grunny about the awkward family tree spacing; it's been bugging me a lot, lately. Thanks. --20:14, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
Another user has already told me that, but thank you for the link to the Fanfic wiki! Henryjh98 12:11, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
RE:Need your opinion:
I wouldn't oppose using the Noble Collection figures on articles. The Noble Collection merchandise is supposed to be faithful to the props used in the films (or, using their words, "authentic recreation[s]" of the props). If that is the case, abiding by our canon policy, they should be regarded as canon as 3rd-tier canonical information ("Other official merchandise").
The only problem I see with this is: How faithful are the Noble Collection items to the film props? We know, from observations, that Noble Collection items present, sometimes, differences from the props (i.e. the handle of Narcissa Malfoy's wand [see BTS section], or the extra room name labels on the Marauder's Map [see this article for an example]). If they are potentially conflicting with film information, then they are going against tier-2 canon and THEN they shouldn't be regarded as canon.
Still they are the only figures we can go by for many of the film wands (at this stage, at least) and I think there would be no harm in using them in articles if, and only if, the wands present no visible difference from their screen-used counterparts (which they are, in theory, modelled after) — thus excluding problematic cases like Narcissa's wand. --17:59, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
YOu are mad dont edit my edited pages you fool are are illeterate about harry potter you noob you mudblood