Archives
*Talk Page Archive 1 (November 28th, 2009-March 4th, 2010) *Talk Page Archive 2 (March 4th, 2010-July 8th, 2010)

New Talk Page Edit

Starts Here. --JKoch^{(Owl Me!)} 23:02, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Archive TemplateEdit

Do you want me to help you get the archive template properly on this?--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 23:08, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Warning Edit

Well, considering:

1. It's an unregistered IP
2. It's their first and only edit
3. It was relatively minor

It was most likely just "hit-and-run" vandalism, and I doubt we'll even see anything from this person again. Personally, I usually save Vandal2 until either they continue to vandalize after getting the Vandal1 warning, or if their edit was especially vulgar, profane, or disruptive. - Nick O'Demus 00:17, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'll admit these are just my personal guidelines. You don't have to apologize for having a different point of view. - Nick O'Demus 00:21, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Prefect Edit

Thanks Hcoknhoj. -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!!) 01:03, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Vote Edit

That vote on the Talk:Hermione Granger page has gotten really close, huh? :P--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 00:57, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I am sure that others will agree with the new image Seth has uploaded and switch around their vote. If the picture gets over 6, I will eliminate the one with less votes, as we can't eliminate the other image, as it wouldn't be fair, as Seth just put on the image a few minutes ago.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 20:00, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

If you change your vote others may follow. And we will finally be able to end this vote. –K.A.J^{•T•C•E•} 20:00, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Private Lessons Edit

I guess so. -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!!) 03:36, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Private Lessons Edit

The original article needs to be moved back, not just copy-and-paste the text, or it will lose the page history. I'll ask an admin to fix it back to the way it was. - Nick O'Demus 03:41, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Bingo. - Nick O'Demus 03:43, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

"Bingo"? -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!!) 03:49, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Grunny fixed it. - Nick O'Demus 07:40, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Chief Snatcher Edit

Kind of iffy. The source reference does have it capitalized as a proper title, but it also says "Chief Snatcher Picture Double", so it's not enough to tell if that will be the character's actual credited name in the film or not. We probably need to find a better reference. I'll go ahead and give it the conjecture tag for now, as the reference it's based on isn't official. - Nick O'Demus 04:07, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Long-term ProjectEdit

I was going to do Mafalda Hopkirk after Griselda Marchbanks, but you can have a go at it. It's just too brief and sourceless. Not so "long-term", though... -- Seth Cooper owl post! 02:50, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

It's great! -- Seth Cooper owl post! 12:54, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comments Edit

Hi Hcoknhoj. Not to nag or anything, but you mustn’t remove peoples comments from talk-pages, as you did with Sirius Black. I know anons are not allowed to vote, but they may still voice thier opinions. Thanks. Jayce ^{•Avada Kedavra•Crucio•Imperio•} 08:49, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, guys. I did it by accident. I must have went back too far on the "backspace" key. As you can see in the history I put "Unsigned" on their comment. My bad.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 21:19, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

My bad too. Sorry Hcoknhoj. Jayce ^{•Avada Kedavra•Crucio•Imperio•} 22:31, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Magical genetics Edit

> Sorry for eavesdropping, but you seem to have put considerable thought into this issue. The population part is a very compelling argument. I going to take a leap and say that you have a biology background. --JKoch[1]^{(Owl Me!)} 13:26, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Guilty as charged - I'm a biologist by training, even though not by career.

Considering that wikis are collaborative projects, I would say that eavesdropping is no crime.

Ngebendi 15:01, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Ginevra weasley's children Edit

OK - must have muffed it again. Reason why?

By the way, OOU means?

Many thanks! Ngebendi 18:26, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Magorian Edit

Actually, the main image was concept artwork for the fifth film, so technically, it is not fan art.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 02:18, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Crookshanks edits. Edit

Certainly.

Whoever wrote that sentence clearly dropped a word, and it was impossible to me to find out which. Someone more skilled in wikis than I am might have found out the author and pointed it out to him, but it is too early for me to know how to do it. This way, I felt that the faulty passage would get a faster resolution than otherwise, and this is what happened.

My apologies.

Ngebendi 05:56, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Editing help. Edit

can you please read this page because i think it needs an edit but im not sure about a bit in it, Ouagadougou.

Molly Wobbles 08:03, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:MagorianEdit

No. It's concept art for the 5th film. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 14:50, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Slughorn Edit

Please read HP&HBP p. 470 (UK edition) :) --Thorning 20:34, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Number of horcruxes. Edit

John, before this one-upmanship with Thorning about the number of Voldemort's horcruxes escalates in an edit war, or whatever, I wanted to ask you. If it looks like a horcrux and behaves like a horcrux and has to be destroyed before Voldemort can be killed, what is it if not a horcrux?

Note seven of the horcrux page on this wikia states that Harry does not count as the horcrux-making process has not been used, but it looks highly suspicious to me. First, the soul fragment within Harry had to be killed before Voldemort could be, and I suspect that it is the killing of the soul fragments to be important rather than the destruction of the horcruxes. Second, a murder has been done (or more likely, at least two, since both James Potter and Lily Evans got killed withing minutes from each other). Third, at the time of the killing of Harry's parents', Voldemort's soul has already been split five times (since there are five horcrux), presumably using the same wand. It is not inconceivable that after repeating the process so many times, in the conditions present on that event, the wand (or Voldemort's subconscious mind) automatically activated the spells for making the horcruxes. after the Avada Kedavra spell that killed (presumably) Lily Evans.

I get the feeling that Thorning is right.

BTW, I noticed Thorning's post after I wrote this.

Ngebendi 21:43, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Apologies. Edit

Sorry, John, for using the wrong term. Having seen what seemed to be a series of reciprocal "undo"es performed within minutes, I used the term "edit war" for want of a better definition, and felt compelled to step in with my opinion.

Guess I will get the knack of things here pretty soon, and in the meanwhile I'll bang my head in a few walls. Please, bear with me.

Ngebendi 23:59, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Mafalda Hopkirk Edit

Well, as little information we know about her, it looks great. Speaking of cleaning up articles, can you help me work on Albus Dumbledore's Pensieve? It only has information about what happened in Half-Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows, so we need information about it from Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 01:46, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I will start a 1997 subsection right now, so you can work off of what I did. If we don't edit the same thing, then it will not matter. That is what I found out while we were editing at the same time.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 02:41, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I was about to do that, I was working on that (I am on a tab right now). But I am working on 1997, so you can change it to 1998.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 02:49, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Well looks like you have alot on your plate ;). Okay, I will keep working on the article. You can make other edits later.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 02:57, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ouagadouga Edit

"the furthest most [sic] point in Siberia," whats the [sic] thing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Molly Wobbles (talk • contribs).

Minerva McGonagall duel(l)ed Edit

Was going to tell you that "dueled" can be spelled with a one or two "l"s - but looks like you already know that.

Just hope I'll be able to get used to the quibbling over spelling - english is not my mother tongue.

Ngebendi 07:39, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Attack Edit

completely accidental... sorry about that --Emmafofemma 18:51, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RE:AD's Pensieve Edit

Great job! It is really referenced now.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 20:18, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

OK Edit

Ok, I had just seen some characters, such as Harry, Ron and Hermione, in the present tense. However, now I can see they're fixed. Thanks! User:Quirinus Quirrell

RE:Attack on Arthur Weasley Edit

Okay.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 21:13, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

I have to leave currently right now, so I will be adding ore references later.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 21:26, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Done.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 02:10, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Order of Merlin Edit

	Order of Merlin (First Class)
	The Order of Merlin is awarded to you by Thorning for having over three-thousand edits on the Harry Potter Wiki.

- Congratulations --Thorning 10:47, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

slytherin infoboxes Edit

I was only changing those of malfoys gang.

Jumpy the elf 22:28, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

I am the king of all purebloods

RE:Fun fact Edit

Good for you :).

By the way, I have created a template for when you need to tell people to use British spelling, syntax and grammar, as I have seen you tell people to use British grammar many times. The link is right here. Feel free to fix it up as much as you want, as it was made specifically for you.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 23:44, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

I think you should add... Edit

> ... so no it should not be noted.

Sorry, Jkoch, you may have been overterse again, because I am not sure that I have gotten what you mean by this. English not being my mother tongue again... Ngebendi 21:50, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Ngebendi 22:01, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Miki1234 Edit

Thanks. I've done so. Jayce ^{•Avada Kedavra•Crucio•Imperio•} 11:26, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Possibly Redundant Article Edit

Half of it is pretty redundant. I'm thinking remove a lot of the stuff about the Minister, leaving just a brief mention and link to the Minister's article, expand the sections on the support staff, and retitle the article as Minister for Magic support staff with a {{Conjecture}} tag. What do you think? - Nick O'Demus 12:50, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Question Edit

It is mentioned in Chamber of Secrets that Slytherin looked like an aged monkey when Harry looked at his statue in the Chamber of Secrets. --L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 22:44, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Susan Bones Edit

Yeah, this one's going to need some work. I'll see what I can do. And congrats on your 1st class OoM! - Nick O'Demus 10:30, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Help Edit

Looks fine to me! You can reference it now.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 13:20, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Ted Lupin Edit

No problems on the Hufflepuff thing; that's the only source I've ever seen for that info, so I don't trust the source :) - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:16, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

attack 81 Edit

do you know why it wasn't working? because last night i did it exactly the way you just did —The preceding unsigned comment was added by emmafofemma (talk • contribs).

Re:Quote source Edit

I removed it as i put the source in but it didn't work as i probbaly writ it wrong Philered WAS HERE! PEACE!

16:16, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Links Edit

Which article are you talking about? And what do you mean "to Lord Voldemort"? User:Quirinus Quirrell

OK! Nevermind, I understood. User:Quirinus Quirrell

Unidentified Death Eaters Edit

By the way, do you agree that the Unidentified Death Eater (III) should be deleted? And maybe the Unidentified Death Eater, as he was also among the 12 Battle of the Department of Mysteries participants? User:Quirinus Quirrell

Hogwarts Castle Edit

Hey, the Hogwarts Castle page keeps getting the main picture changed... so should we have a vote on it?--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 03:25, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Protecting DH movieEdit

I agree. I'm going to protect it at once. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 00:41, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

New Pagees ;) Edit

Thanks verry much :)

The-Free-House-Elf 08:46, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Helena Ravenclaw Edit

Well, kind of. I'll just copy the source from the summary.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 21:34, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Order of the Phoenix Page Edit Edit

Sorry if I'm going about this in the wrong way; I am a new person, so I'm going to come off as very ignorant.

The edit I made in the Order of Pheonix today that you changed back is what is bothering me. Mr. Weasley was not in the First Order, if I am not mistaken. Even if he was, further up on the page where the table telling about each Order member is listed, he is only put as being in the Second Order. So, when it says:

"Molly Weasley is not stated to have been a member of the original Order, despite her husband and her brothers all being members." (bold is mine)

That would be incorrect, wouldn't it? He was never mentioned as being part of the Original order either, likely for the same reason as Molly. Her brothers were mentioned in the picture, but Mr. Weasley wasn't.

So, I don't know if you want to change it, or how we go about doing things now, but I just thought I'd let you know, because it bothered me. I use the site myself to check up on obscure facts, and I want people to get the right information.

Thanks,

Moonyschick 01:29, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Trio Edit

I got rid of the infobox and the article. It was meant to serve as a simple disambig page, not an article with an infobox, as you said on the talk page. Thanks.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 02:33, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

HOW Edit

it's not vandalism

Triwizard TournamentEdit

The reason I have proceeded with the edits is for the exact reason you just sent me on my Talk Page. The article looked extremely cluttered before my edits, therefore I was trying to un-clutter it. Lee7003 16:27, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

RE:QuestionEdit

What do you mean? I did not get that, sorry. Also, you've done a good job with that dialogue it's correctly formatted and I'm almost sure the quote is correct now. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 21:39, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

I think I see what you mean. But I don't know if that can be done as those are, after all, supposed to be footnotes. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 22:38, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Loyalty Edit

I added it at Ron and Hermione, because it was at Harry. If the trio should be delted, then the loyalty "Harry Potter" should be deleted too, i guess. --Thorning 08:37, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, i agree --Thorning 17:53, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

I agree too. I think "Lord Voldemort" and "Albus Dumbledore" should also be deleted, especially when "Death Eatrs" and "Order of the Phoenix" is listed above it.--Rodolphus 21:01, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: LinksEdit

What's the point? I just tried both of those links. "Voldemort" redirects to "Tom Riddle" just fine. Same with "Barty Crouch Jr." redirecting to "Bartemius Crouch Jr." If it'll redirect without any problems, why does it matter?Dstebbins 20:44, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:QuestionEdit

No, that's not vandalism. We have to assume good faith on this, as the user probably didn't notice he was deterring the article's quality. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 22:09, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re:American Speller Edit

Thanks. I have reverted all his contributions --Thorning 07:57, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

RE:BlogsEdit

I've never really had any participation on the voting/shuting down process, so I suggest you to ask Cavalier One instead. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 18:18, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Blogs Edit

At the moment, they're not. Wikia is refusing to suspend the feature since they are being used by a lot of people. I'm counter-arguing at the moment, and hopefully it may do some good. If not, I intend to set a strict policy for blogs in place, and police them rigidly. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 13:50, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Wikia believes that the current vote is not a wide enough consensus to warrant the suspension of the feature. As I said, I'm arguing the point and not giving up on it :) - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 07:35, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blog policy Edit

The thing is, that's already covered by the editing policy. "The Harry Potter Wiki is not the place for fanfiction or roleplaying". Currently the blogs are being used exclusively for that purpose, and should therfore be discontinued completely. I'm really angry that wikia won't allow us to remove something from our wiki, that we as a community have unanimously agreed is counterproductive. Jayce ^{•Avada Kedavra•Crucio•Imperio•} 18:33, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Actually there are other wiki hosts. And it is possible to transfer the Harry Potter wiki to another host. It's been done before on a wiki that I used to edit. They decided that wikia wasn't serving their best interests, so they upped and moved to another provider. Here's a list of other wiki providers. Jayce ^{•Avada Kedavra•Crucio•Imperio•} 18:54, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Misc Edit

Yeah, I know. That's why I usually try to get everything done in one sitting. Making, say, ten separate changes just clutters the recent changes page and floods the edit history. --Cubs Fan ^{(Talk to me)} 06:40, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Policy Edit

As i think, Harry still lives. He lives at least -2017. Which policy says, that it's "was"? I just read a lot of them, and i cannot find it

Thanks. It was my bad

RE:Vampire batEdit

Hahaha. =D -- Seth Cooper owl post! 20:36, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Second Wizarding War, redux Edit

Hey, H. After our last discussion about reffing the SWW article, I've broken the Deathly Hallows refs down into chapters (I don't want to use specific pages, since it's possible everybody's copy is different). Do you want to take a crack at Goblet (which by itself should be relatively easy, as the war doesn't start until the end of the book) and Order, and I'll do Half-Blood Prince? --Cubs Fan ^{(Talk to me)} 06:17, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Hey! Edit

Oh, that makes sense! Well, I was born in England. If I forget the spelling (I live in he US) I can ask my parents XD! TheLunarEclipse 10:32, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Latter Edit

What does it mean when people say "the latter"? --Scarletmoon579^{(Talk to me!)}

Thanks!--Scarletmoon579^{(Talk to me!)}

Re: Hermione Edit

Yeah, I've noticed that a few other users have had to revert some of his edits. But I can see it's done in good faith, so no harm, no foul. --Cubs Fan ^{(Talk to me)} 18:09, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

How much time? Edit

How long do we have until the blogs get shut down? Or have they already been shut down? --Scarletmoon579^{(Talk to me!)}

Thanks!!!!! Edit

I just wanted to say thank you,as you are the only person on this website that has not hounded me about anything.

RE:Conjeture Edit

That's correct, yes. It's not an official title, so it's improper to capitilize it. Jayce ^{•Avada Kedavra•Crucio•Imperio•} 19:14, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Gellert Grindelwald Edit

Can I please ask why you reverted my recent edit? I know it's a set pic, but surely it's better to have an image of him as a teenager, as that's when they were freinds. Alessandro Auditore 19:37, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Alessandro Auditore 19:41, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Draco MalfoyEdit

I guess so. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 23:32, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

UMBRIDGE HOUSE Edit

So, other headmasters, such as Scamander, shouldn't have a "not in Slytherin". User:Quirinus Quirrell

The Snatcher Edit

New user name for Jayce Carver.

RE:White TombEdit

Actually, Fawkes left right after the tomb was created. See the quote in "The Ceremony" subsection of this section of Funeral of Albus Dumbledore.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 03:19, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

HelloEdit

Hi, man. I would like to contribute on this wiki...! :)--Lord David 22:22, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Congratulations and a Question Edit

Thank you. I also agree that the Biographies should be primarily chronological. If you want to run a rewrite by me, sure. Right now, I'm trying to get sources on all the new actor articles people have been making for the DH film, then I'm going to try to clean up the nominations pages for the featured content (QOTW, DYK, etc.), then there are users like Wizard44 whose edits need to be cleaned up, then I still need to get around to formalizing the Alias policy and putting it into effect. So much for taking a time off for a breather. : ( - Nick O'Demus 07:56, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Bella in HBP Edit

Why did you write that Bellatrix is mentioned only in HBP? Isn't she in the second chapter ('Spinner's End')? --El Profeta Vespertino 19:50, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Project page Edit

You just create a new article, with the title User:(your name)/Sandbox (or Workpad, Project Page, etc.) For example, Cavalier One has Parchment for article rewrites (in-universe), Workpad for article rewrites (real world), and Scratch for templates and other ideas (although as far as I know most users only need one workpage). You can create as many sub-pages for your userpage as you feel you need, although you might want to add links to them on your main userpage so you can keep track of them. Hope this helps. - Nick O'Demus 06:14, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Looks good so far. It might need some minor touch-ups in a few places, but the layout looks fine. Sorry I haven't been around much lately, but things have been a little hectic. I'm going out of town tomorrow, and I'm hoping it'll settle down a bit after I get back on the 21st. - Nick O'Demus 16:13, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

RE:ProjectEdit

Nice job so far! So far I cannot see anything wrong with it, and it looks as chronological as it can. I am currently working on the Dudley Dursley page, but it needs much more work than the Ron Weasley page, and I am trying to get it to FA status by partially rewriting it and adding alot of references. Thanks.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 18:44, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Mistakes Edit

Yeah, I know. But when he says "[his] family", to me that means his immediate family: parents and siblings. --Cubs Fan ^{(Talk to me)} 05:15, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Quote revertsEdit

John, I wonder if there's a problem with Wikia's software,

I remember having corrected a word spelling (changed a "prove" to "proved" in Neville Longbottom's page, section "Battle of Hogwarts") and the page's history appears to give it as a complete deletion of the quote, which you duly reverted. If this is correct, there may be a but in the software dealing with the modification of quotes.

To whom should I seek help, because this is nothing I can deal with myself?

Thanks! Ngebendi 15:05, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Possibly - I remember this happened before. Well, next time I find something in a quote, I'll see to it I do it right. Many thanks! Ngebendi 17:14, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Parentheticals Edit

Will do! But feel free to rearrange the sentence if needed, instead of simply revert to the older version. English is second language for me, and mother tongue for you. Ngebendi 20:18, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Notes Edit

I would tend to disagree. Deliberately trying to scare people away from making edits isn't really in the spirirt of the wiki. A polite request is all that is required. If people disobey, then further action can be taken. Jayden Matthews 12:28, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'm 100x100 agree with Jayden.Disagreements can be resolved by talking, no problem.

RE:Past/PresentEdit

Yes... What about it? -- Seth Cooper owl post! 17:08, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oh... I must be really out of my mind; I hadn't even noticed I'd done that. Thanks for being attentive! =) -- Seth Cooper owl post! 17:23, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Infobox picsEdit

Well, they do have the right to start a vote. I'll cast my vote right away. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 13:15, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Nerea-1991‎‎Edit

Thanks for taking care of that. Her question was so disjointed, I couldn't understand what she was trying to ask. --Cubs Fan ^{(Talk to me)} 19:14, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Edit

Thanks for the heads up. I wasn't completely aware of this fact, and I'm sure this tip will help me in the future.

Thanks, NevilleismyHERO 19:06, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Removed Edit

Sorry,didnt know it,just liked the colour :) Nevermind I changed my template.Dimitris8895 20:33, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Horcruxes Edit

Sure. I'll get started as soon as I am done drafting Dudley Dursley.--L.V.K.T.V.J.^{(Send an owl!)} 23:50, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Sourcing Edit

Sorry, that it is not the right form, but I never did it and I am not sure how to do it right. Perhaps you can explain me. I see unter Controls the Source. Must I only klick or what must I do? Harry granger 20:56, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but I have more than one time looked in the source. Perhaps I am too stupid. How you can see, I just failed twice and I don't make it to anger anyone. I think I should better ask an admin for help. Perhaps then it does function better. Harry granger 20:25, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Miki1234 Edit

They've been warned, and I'm keeping an eye on them. If they do it again, they get blocked for a year. - Nick O'Demus 17:42, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I'll take a look then. - Nick O'Demus 17:55, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: New Blog Policy Edit

No problem. But weren't they supposed to be taken down like, three weeks ago? --peace~ love~ tater tots 00:36, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Question about you Edit

Hi, I saw that you have two names: Hcoknhoj and JKoch. Why that? Are that two accounts or what does it mean? Harry granger 19:43, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Antonin Dolohov Edit

Why do you delete my contributions on the artcle about Antonin Dolohov?.All images are correct; look the mask.Is the same mask that Richard Cubison said that he uses in the film.Pol 871 15:46, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

please, am waiting for your response.Pol 871 15:12, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

when a character is so minor, it is logical that the images are in low quality.But it doesn't mean that would damage the article.Pol 871 17:54, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Aurora Sinistra Edit

As you can see, administrators have verified that she is aurora sinistra. Before to accuse someone, you can solve the things talking.This is the best option.Pol 871 17:19, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Main Page ArticleEdit

Thanks for the reminder. I went ahead and changed it to the next Featured Article on the schedule (Lavender Brown). ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 02:48, July 8, 2010 (UTC)