Before editing, be sure to read the wiki's policies. Please sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to automatically produce your name and the current date. Be sure to verify your e-mail address in your preferences. Before attempting any major article rewrites please read the layout guide. If you have any questions, check out the policy and help pages (see here for editing help), add a question to the Community portal, view the forum or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
- xD Dr. Galenos (talk) 23:37, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps not; I only later read the sentence about phoenixes being the exception rather than the rule about dead being definitely dead. So I'm not gonna fight for this. MinorStoop 22:00, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
- There has recently been a spate of fairly-to-extremely heated exchanges about highly speculative topics, and HPR1 has been involved in the latest of them, standing up for one or two quite indefensible positions. Since this leaves a mark, I'm now wary of his edits, but, in this case, I can't really back my opinion up.
- Do me a favor, please - if you need to answer me back, bring it on my talk page, so I get notified. Thanks! MinorStoop 22:12, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Do remember, if you are going to badmouth me, that I can read. Thank you. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 22:20, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Realize, Im not insulting anyone. All I said was that I found MinorStoop's choice of words amusing. Dr. Galenos (talk) 22:21, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
Why do you keep undoing my revisions?
You said that there were more than 12 N.E.W.T. students in 1996 you were wrong. In the Half-blood prince on pg. 182 it says that "When they arrived in the corrider they saw that there were only a dozen people progressing to N.E.W.T. level... Four Slytherins had made it through, including Malfoy, Four Ravenclaws were there and one Hufflepuff Ernie Macmillion" plus Harry, Ron, and Hermione that makes twelve.
Out of curosity why do you keep undoing my revisons on Harry's Transfiguration Ability on page 309 it says that "they had just embarked upon the immensely difficult topic of Human Transfiguration; working in front of mirrors thay were supposed to changing the color of their own eyebrows" and on page 310 it mentions that Harry succeeded in transfiguring hie eyebrow because Luna says "Oh hellow, Harry" "did ypu know one of your eyebrows is bright yellow?" It says on the wiki that anyone skilled enough can perform Human Transfiguration and obviously he can since, he's listed as a practitioner. It deserves to be mentioned.
As a side note if any of that came of as rude then i'm sorry that wasn't my intention. It should also be known that I wouldn't put anything on this wiki if I wasn't 100% sure. Please reply as soon as possible and on your page.
Misskatniss1546, I would like to appologize. I have finals coming up, and last night, I was effectively drunk. Not on alcohol, but the symptoms were the same. I was so exhausted that I wasnt thinking clearly. You were completely right to put it in, and I fully support the edit (now that I've gotten some sleep). Once again, I am sorry for the inconvenience I caused you. Dr. Galenos (talk) 14:20, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you and once again if I came off rude I apologize. I know know that u support my potions edit but, what do think about what I said about his Transfiguration skills. It should be added, it irritates me when people list some of the persons skills and don't do it justice.
I have finals coming up as well; Medical Terminology and Anatomy. I've been studying like crazy. I know how stressful it is.
Please resond and on your page
Glad you understand. :) You dont need to apologize, you were being perfectly polite considering. And I totally agree, Professor Potter is very skilled in Transfiguration.
Lee charms O.W.L.
On the Charms (class) page it has Lee listed as having achieved an O.W.L. inthe subject. Since that edit has been there for awhile and I don't see anyone one just making it up, what would be the point.Misskatniss1546 (talk) 13:40, January 21, 2014 (UTC)Misskatniss1546
I understand where you're coming from, but the wiki's policies say that there needs to be a souce for such things, a source outside of the wiki. Dr. Galenos (talk) 15:05, January 21, 2014 (UTC)
Some of these character pages are over run with a lot of useless pictures that distract from the text. Don't get me wrong i'm all for pictures, it's just that when there are too many in a section it looks bad, the only pictures that sould be on a page are ones that give you a better understanding of the text you just read. Also some of the picturres on a page are massive when they don't need to be and the ones that should be a bigger size, so you can see them more easily are tiny. The pictures on pages need to be cleaned up a bit, that's what I was doing Misskatniss1546 (talk) 15:35, March 4, 2014 (UTC)Misskatniss1546
Im all for removing the uneeded pictures. I was asking if you could give a summary of the edit. That way I (and others) know if checking the page is nessisary. Like, if the edit summary is "adding categories", I personally couldn't care less. If its "removing unnessisary pictures", chances are that I'll just ignore it if the edit was by someone who's been here for a while. Dr. Galenos (talk) 15:44, March 4, 2014 (UTC)