RE: Salem Witches' Institute
have you looked at that link I was trying to remove?
It's someone's personal clip - totally unnecessaryWonka2011 04:41, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
Why are you always removing Harry's Freaky Tales?22.214.171.124 03:59, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
Where in the movie (part 1 or 2) is the picture you posted on the page Nymphadora Tonks with the caption Remus and Tonks during the beginning of the Battle of Hogwarts? Please let me know. I am a HUGE Tonks and Lupin fan and I want to know from where in the movie the picture is from. If you could give me an approxamite time, that would be great.
Nanny McPhee Sequel
Actually, it was released as "Nanny McPhee Returns," but that was a retitling for the U.S./Canada release. It aired in theatres in the U.K. as Nanny McPhee and the Big Bang. Seeing as it's the normal policy to use British titles for everything else here, I think it makes sense to use the British title for this as well. ProfessorTofty 04:27, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
30th Anniversary of James and Lily's deaths
Why did you delete this? Those links showed that this event is being recognized by Harry Potter fans all over.
KK thanks for welcoming me :D
Peanut butter is flipping awesomeClove1001
George Weasly's letter to Fred
Hi, Cubs Fan! You deleted this image above. I now saw File:Tumblr lpcjmfqwRd1qdyf29o1 500.png. When you look at it you will find it very interesting.21:44, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I'm totally fine with this, but can I just ask the reason for the convention of writing "[Someone] was ..." as opposed to "[Someone] is ..." on the Harry Potter Wiki? As long as the person is still "alive" (as of the current time in the Harry Potter universe) I see no reason to refer to them in the past tense. Thanks in advance, and sorry in anticipation of any noobness I may exhibit in this post. Aaronsclee 04:41, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
Since your an administrator, and since Cavailar One is not responding, can you please unprotect the page "Draco Malfoy's wand". It has been protected for some time now, and I feel it should be unprotected. Could you do that? Thank you! P.S Go cubs (I'm from the chicagoland area) Wizard211 03:09, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
Article Nymphadora Tonks
In this article is written that Sirius is Nymphadora's uncle. In the summary you gave: She and Sirius are cousins once removed; he would be her uncle if he and Andromeda were siblings. I'm not sure if you wrote the text or only forgot to revert the text, but the child of my cousin is my great-cousin and I am his/her great-cousin and not the aunt or - in this case - the uncle. I thought I should contact you first.17:37, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
I would like to request of you to please check the contribution I made to the Talk section regarding the Trace Charm, because I don't want to do the edition on the Trace page itself, since I haven't done any calculations with regard to the age and the months. Math just makes me dizzy and nauseous. So, in addition to my previous request I would like you to consider what I said and if you think it's good enough can you please do the computations yourself etc. etc. Thank you very much and more power to you! Thanksherman 14:07, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
I have accidentally posted something anonymously and don't want people seeing my IP address. Is there any way I can remove it?
Sychokitty 09:10, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
r u the 41 year old virgin (Neville Potter 06:32, February 2, 2012 (UTC))
Could I just ask when in the year the Hogwarts acceptance letter is posted? On it is 'We await your owl by no later than July 31', so it is before then. But is it when the student turns 11, or a set date before the 31st? And if it is the latter, does the student have to be 11 before the letter is posted, 31 July, or 1 September? Its just that this would affect the possible earlier and latter birthdates of minor video game characters, which is bugging me for some reason. Thanks in advance! aaronsclee (talk) 07:50, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
Icarlyftw 07:19, February 19, 2012 (UTC)Sorry. I think I was trying to add the name actually. I'm still learning how things go here. I like the Cubs too by the way because my uncle is from Chicago, but I live near Boston so my favorite team is the Red Sox. I really feel bad for them and I hope they win the World Series if the Red Sox don't. You should find it easier with Theo Epstein though.
In an article, we only have one link to other articles, right? For example, on the Harry Potter page, there are many mentions of Ronald Weasley. We don't, however, link to that article every time Ron is mentioned. But what are the exceptions to this? In the Harry Potter article, Voldemort is mentioned in the quote at the top. But do we put the one link to the Tom Riddle page there and nowhere else? Because many people skip the quote and go straight to the article and would miss the link. What are the conventions for the placement of links? Thanks! aaronsclee (talk) 06:49, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
This is pure nonesense
You know that page you deleted? My brother logged into my account and messed around with everyone by adding a page filled with junk.
Sorry for your inconvenience.
P.S. I really need to change my password.
Wormyworm 00:55, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
Hilariously - to me anyway - I've always thought that UK English (which I've used all my life) wrote dates out the way they were spoken. Ie; "The 7th of March", and that something like "7 March", or "March 7" was a distinctly American thing. *facepalm* —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Derpherpherp (talk • contribs).
The Dracorex Hogwartsia is not fanon. I have numerous links I was trying to add to the page, I am not good with computer talk. I am offended because I put a lot of work into that article, and it is all true. Sev Lover Forever 03:17, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! Okay! Sorry that I didn't know about the spelling. I'm just new here and from NYC. Go Dodgers and Cubs!
Cupcakesrule 03:54, March 23, 2012 (UTC)Cupcakesrule
Hi, Cubs! I saw you are typing the text. Perhaps you don't know that there is a Template:British. When you use this the text is automatically created from the server. I thought I should write it to you because it simplifys things.
07:28, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
thanks for the notice before and i'm sorry i don't understand how Harry Potter editing it. I've read privacy. once again i thank you
The same user recreated the page despite that you deleted it so I put a deletion page on both that page and the picture the user uploaded for it. -Adv193 22:30, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
The very same IP user responsible for the TompkinsHorner82 you deleted is creating another page like it and I suspect this will keep happening which is why I am contacting you. -Adv193 04:08, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
hi just wondering is this a true site, because im feeling out of place and nearly all my friends have turned down on me,
meaning i feel odd. like seeing unrealistic things. that parents dont see.
is this a witch or wizard/ Jade1987 15:14, April 15, 2012 (UTC)jade franz
So sorry to bother you, and I know we don't really talk much. However, it is rather annoying to be constantly logging in whenever I attempt to edit an article (recently I have only been doing so to remove fanon and to add information from Pottermore and such valid websites (which I am usually late at doing anywho) rather than my vandalising ways of the past). My annoyance and aggrievance were indeed a good price to pay for having done such wretched things to this website. I ask, thus, for you to please allow me to add information and resource to this wiki using my IP Adress; I promise you that I will not add any content that is disagreeable or in any way incorrect, the way I have done in the past.
Wishing you an excellent evening (and night), and hoping you the best in days to come,
And apologizing for missing your birthday,
Hunnie Bunn 01:24, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
Hello Cubs Fan2007 how do you change your singnature and could you visit crazypedia and help me out with it im just starting out with it and i need help making it grow
Iheartsevsnape 19:51, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
Thought you ought to know
If the simple past is policy, why, in the "Defensive Magical Theory" entry, is Dolores Umbridge's opinion presented in the present? Also, where might one find a comprehensive rendering of all appropriate protocols and specifications of this nature? Thanks, Alex Jiskran (talk) 22:52, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
No, I was referring to the passage you rolled back. I shall copy the relevant lines here.
and the fact that Dolores Umbridge approves of the book, it can be assumed that Defensive Magical Theory discourages the use of any defensive magic that could be used aggressively. Hermione Granger strongly disagreed
SKYPOTION0604I've been reading Harry Potter ever since I was in my elementary days. Harry Potter became my life and I am still fascinated by the wonderful world of magic. I hope to help improve the pages of HP wiki with the best of my abilities.
Just an Idea
Hi im a long time fan of the wiki and wanted to say its awesome and wondered if it would be possible to contribute. I noticed on the various character pages there are i guess what i would call issues with the organization and wording in the magical abilities sections. Namely the common name of a branch of magic is given instead of simply stating the characters level of skill in the area. Such as on McGonagall's page as a point of reference. At the top of that section it gives a intro with much of it being whats echoed in other entries located below it. Heading it under Magic Mastery and using the first sentence alone would be fine unless more overview is needed and then making everything else a subheading under it. Secondly there is the term underage magic. The issue is noting that she was capable of underage magic when she was underage which she is long pass. Its relevant to her history (which is stated in her history section), but currently has nothing to do with who she currently is and probably should be stated under a subheading like 'Inherent Magical Aptitude'. Then Transfiguration while its basically stating it on her page as though we are referring to the branch of magic itself. While agree it should link there its not really focusing on her personal skill. I would state it to be "Transfiguration Master". Then theres a heading that says martial magic which is odd causes its not used on most other pages as well theres also defense against the dark arts and dark arts. Neither specifying outright her skill just simply acting as another link to those pages. Noting her skill in the dark arts such as "dark arts expert" and then considering how the defense of the D.A. and offensive magic is both martial simply stating her to a master duelist would be far easier then separate categories saying the same thing over again. The theres no definition of charm skill and patronus charm is separate from charm entirely instead of subheaded under it, making it seem as though they are unrelated branches of magic. Logical thinking and leadership seem to be more abilities then anything magic so should be separated from magic section and wandless and nonverbal are two separate concepts yet they are lumped together. The last point is there is alot of stating within the section of how skilled a character is but then downplaying the skill with however she/he had help from so and so or Voldomort was using the elder wand without full mastery of it. I get that is what occurred but i dont see how it detracts from that characters personal skill and therefore shouldnt be stated as if it does otherwise it defeats the purpose of stating what they are capable of. Thank you for reading my long post here. If possible i would show you what i mean on McGonagall's page in the magical abilities section and if you choose to disagree and are not interested in my input in this regard, well thanks for your time none the less. -Salubri (talk)
If you have a moment, could you take a look at this here? I really think we ought to move on this before the system just switches us over automatically and we get caught off-guard. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:48, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
User Busyman213 has been creating unnecessary pages that are related to the chapters of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. Today is the second time that this user has done this so I need to give you the heads up. -Adv193 (talk) 16:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Cubs Fan2007! Have you seen the avatar of this banned user? I find it's horrible. Can't it be deleted? That can trigger nightmares in younger individuals. 20:45, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I only wanted to tell you that Grunny has deleted the avatar. Luckily he saw no problem with deleting it.
18:27, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
List of spells / Spells (Shorter)
The talk page of "List of spells" was also moved to "Spells (Shorter)". I'm not sure how to move back so I thought I should tell you.
10:46, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I see. Thanks. 16:36, November 6, 2012 (UTC)