Userboxes - automatic adding category "Pure Blood Users" on Cubs Fan2007s talk page
Re: Removing the Individuals who knew about Horcruxes category from pages
These are the words spoken by Harry Potter during the final battle. Therefore, everyone knew about the Horcruxes, of the wizard who were in the castle of Hogwarts. Meaning categories "Individuals who knew about Horcruxes" — NO. They became known, and McGonagall and Flitwick and Mrs. Weasley, and many others.
Game Boy Colo(u)r
Hi! First of all, thank you for your recent edits helping convert American spellings to the proper British ones. Many of them were very helpful. However, I'd just like to point out that the Game Boy Color was released under the American spelling in Great Britain (see, for instance, this page on the official European Pokémon website), so changing "color" to "colour" is, in that one instance only, inappropriate. Otherwise, keep up the good work! -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 18:28, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
Harry Potter movies missing on ABC Family?
Hey since it is harry potter weekend on abc family right now and I am watching it, why isnt the 1st, 2nd, and 4th movie premiering anymore? It only shows the 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th movie. Can you help me with why this is happening? HaloLegends86 (talk) 00:48, July 26, 2015 (UTC) HaloLegends86
Hi, Thanks for editing Petrova - some of the names on the list of male names seemed questionable but that was an obvious one. I am wondering if you could edit or delete Shaw family since I think I made a mess of it even though I tried my best. Trying to get like names together. Thanks again in advance. (Vaudree (talk) 04:00, December 11, 2015 (UTC))
I'm sorry to say that I was away, but the matter seems to have been taken care of by Starstuff. Cheers. -- 19:41, February 18, 2016 (UTC)
I'm here to apologise for my actions the last time that I was on the wiki. I won't apologise for fighting for what I believe is right... but I will apologise for the way I went about it. However, I would appreciate it if, in future, once you've undone an edit of mine, you also post on my talk page to explain why. There's more room for detail there and edit wars can be avoided with us having a discussion over it. Can you do that? It'll save so much bother. Thanks. --HarryPotterRules1 (talk) 00:58, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
Your edits to the Hogwarts Express Page
The Chosen One prophecy
Hey! I just wanted to drop in to say why I edited the Chosen one Prophecy. You put on there that the prophecy was possibly made at the time of conception, near Halloween which would by 1979; since Harry was born in 1980. Sybill's phrophecy about the chosen one was made during her interview with Dumbledore which happened in 1980.
Yeah, no prob. Keep your eye on him, though; I heard through the grapevine that KillerBird is a sock of Jdogno7 trying to circumvent his ban. I'm inclined to agree, given his recent edit war (double check his edits) over "sex" and "gender". -- 01:48, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
So I recently added an application for Chat Moderator (I know, sounds weird, I explain it all in the application), and I was just wondering if you could go and have a look to see what you think about it,
Hope that you are well, and that you have a nice day,
02:20, August 6, 2016 (UTC)
Hey man, thanks for the support! It means a lot to me.
Hope you have an awesome evening,
09:50, August 6, 2016 (UTC)
Re: Heads up
Yeah, he's kind of on my radar, but I appreciate the warning. I mentioned this in a section above, but I heard through the grapevine that KB is a sock of Jdogno7. I reverted one of his edits on Delphini earlier and am doing my best to refrain from starting an edit war; I said my piece, and I'm gonna let someone else try (however fruitless) to reason with him. -- 03:58, August 7, 2016 (UTC)
you do realise i wasnt putting info i was vandalising it for laughs right? can i at least vandalise just ONE page and have it stay that way —Preceding unsigned comment added by PAIGE ROX M8 (talk) 10:07, August 21 2016 (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
RE:Burden of proof?
It works the other way around, though. We'd only add a certain piece of information to an article if there's a source to back it up. No apparent source is reason enough to remove something (especially something doubtful) from an article. This is because while it's difficult to prove that isn't supposed to be Marietta (it's impossible to prove that, really), we also have no reason to believe that is supposed to be her. The same could be said for any female student background character in every one of the films. --01:45, September 12, 2016 (UTC)