Is there a template or label for non-canon items? Mafalda Hopkirk 01:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd hold off on the non-canon templates for a while. DJ should be bringing his canon policy in for review soon. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 08:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Do we really need a separate article on this? Apart from being non canon it's not particulary significant, should probably be merged with Hogwarts Castle if anything. - Vaysey Slytherin 08:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if a whole article is needed, but it shouldn't be put in with Hogwarts Castle because it's not really part of the actual castle - it was only made for the movie. Unless it's at the bottom with other non-canon items, i guess. Mafalda Hopkirk 13:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

No reason to assum it was built in summer 1993. lots of parts of the castle happen not to be seen in the first two movies. It doesn't mean they werent there.

We can see from the ast scene in Chamber of Secrets that it wasn't there and so I think we can presume it was built in the summer of 1993. Joeworthy 11:31, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Does anyone else find it strange that McGonagall would order the bridge destroyed? After all, the lack of a bridge would not stop any full-fledged witch or wizard from crossing... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talkcontribs).

You are right. But that was only for the film, for the drama. It wasn't in the book, because Jo thought of this, the filmmakers don't. By the way, don't forget to sign your post with
4 (~).  Harry granger   Talk   contribs