The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Do we really need three identical articles on individuals who's voices are only ever heard once in the backround? Jayden Matthews 18:21, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

Four, actually. And I have to agree. If we have to have this at all, can we at least merge them all into a single article? -- 1337star (talk) 18:27, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

Now six. Jayden Matthews 18:41, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

Make that seven. Jayden Matthews 18:47, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

May I be ironical? Numer I is deleted. Who was him? The other six exist already. Harry granger 20:36, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

I think we should keep this article, as well as Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (I), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (III), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (III), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (V), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (VII), as we have to keep articles of persons we hear talk. Danniesen 21:31, October 26, 2011 (Denmark)

I thought that it was Lavender who said that. I remember she was there cheering on Ron. 68.226.202.135 19:17, December 6, 2011 (UTC)