The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

I think we should keep this article, as well as Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student, Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (II), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (IV), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (V), Unidentified 1996 Quidditch practice spectator student (VII), as we have to keep articles of persons we hear talk. Danniesen 21:29, October 26, 2011 (Denmark)

Why do we have to keep articles of everyone we hear talk? If they aren't notable in any way, shape or form why do we need an article for them? -Shorty1982 00:29, October 27, 2011 (UTC)