Talk:Types of magic
From Harry Potter Wiki
[edit] Split
I think we should split this into multiple articles. What do you think? -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 17:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Seth, I think we could make multiple articles based on the different categories, but i think the one main article should remain as quick reference. When the categories are in the same place on the same page it provides good comparisons and the basics of information. Mafalda Hopkirk 16:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but I think that Curse, Charm, Hex, Jinx, etc. should have their own article. -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 18:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes I totally agree. Let's make those new articles, but keep the main one as well. Mafalda Hopkirk 18:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, let me just remove the split tag -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 18:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem leaving the split tag until the work has been done. It isn't a split & delete tag. It redirects people to this dicsussion. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 20:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, let me just remove the split tag -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 18:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes I totally agree. Let's make those new articles, but keep the main one as well. Mafalda Hopkirk 18:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but I think that Curse, Charm, Hex, Jinx, etc. should have their own article. -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 18:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Splitting the 'Spells' Section up.
i think you should split the spells section up - as nobody remember the name of EVERY spell and when your looking for something in particular, you dont want to be going through the whole Alphabet and reading the descriptions looking for them.
It would be easier for referensing, because if your just using a quick spell, say, in a FanFiction and then spend about an hour searching for the one your looking for. it takes up alot of time.
just saying :)
--82.46.198.124 00:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
MikeyRiddle
I believe the article should be split. --Profiteor 21:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
I agree. --Kraftword 19:29, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
