Are we sure that thought in itself is a form of magic? --Rodolphus (talk) 15:30, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

I wouldn't say so. Thought is just a biological thing. I wouldn't say thought was literally a type of magic. I think it is more likely the Ministry of Magic were playing around with science and studying how the brain works using magic. -- Kates39 (talk) 15:34, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

We should rephrase it then, shouldn't we? Also, why does it have an infobox? It's not a spell.--Rodolphus (talk) 15:36, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

I agree. The infobox is strange as well, and shows it isn't a piece of magic in itself. -- Kates39 (talk) 15:42, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

Do we have a suitable replacement category? Magic seems not fitting.--Rodolphus (talk) 15:45, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

Maybe Biology, which is a subcategory of Science? I think that definition is better than magic. -- Kates39 (talk) 15:58, May 29, 2017 (UTC)