Ok, I know this is real, but I placed a fact template on it because I want a link to the actual statement in the article. If anyone can source one, I'd be grateful since I don't have time at the moment. Many thanks. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 10:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, I found one. Template removed. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 07:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Cries* I went to Disney World this year. I just read about this! Sure Disney World was awsome, but it must could've been more awesome (for me) with that!
I am kinda excited about it though. If I do go back to Disney World, I could see it! Anyone else excited about it?
Events happenning at the WWHP are to be considered happenning when if no actual in-universe time frame is ever given? Present day? --22:14, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
Number of articles
I noticed that "Flight of the Hippogriff" and "Dragon Challenge" both have two separate articles, one with a (Wizarding World of Harry Potter Theme Park) disambiguation tag, and one without. Since it's about the same thing, is there really a need for two different articles? Since no other articles exist about these subjects, I don't think the parenthesis is necessary. I'm not quite sure what content to move, if any, or if the whole article can just be redirected. --18:10, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
I agree the duplicates should be removed BFG86 21:26, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
Should be in Britan
Who agrees that America has just gone and stolen the credit by doing this. Those people just dont care about copyright and i hate them for it the parks a disgrace. Britan the rightful owners should have this not the RICH FAT GITS. Darth Rishda 21:22, March 19, 2012 (UTC)