Guys, I wonder. This Runcorn is actually one of the original forty right? but his/her name is gone from the original forty in the pottermore, but acording to this picture

Runcorn is one of them (his name is above sidebottom and below roper.)

Here is pottermore's original forty transript http://lady-slytherin-forever.tumblr.com/post/8979923935/the-original-forty-off-pottermore or you can see it on your potter more account. So is this JK Rowling mistake or another secret of harry potter? PS: english is my second languange. sorry, if my grammar is bad :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Zaki alwi (talk • contribs).

Which is odd because, if you count the names (not counting the "crossed out" entries), the 'Original Forty' are only thirty-nine. I'm almost sure Rowling accidentally skipped Runcorn when she was transcribing her notes. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 00:15, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Runcorn is a girl; there are twenty boys and nineteen girls on the pottermore list! 147.41.128.8 03:00, January 16, 2013 (UTC)