Harry Potter Wiki
Harry Potter Wiki
Line 14: Line 14:
   
 
::The fact that "Boggart banishing spell" is not captalized leads me to think that, perhaps, this is just a description and, if so, it would be improper to call the article that when we have the steadfast "Riddikulus" (it would be like having an article titled "that bushy-haired girl" instead of "Hermione Granger"). -- <small><span style="border:2px solid #333333;">[[User:Seth Cooper|<font style="color:#333333;">&nbsp;'''Seth Cooper'''&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Seth Cooper|<font style="background:#333333;color:white;">&nbsp;'''owl&nbsp;post!'''</font>]]</span></small> 01:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
::The fact that "Boggart banishing spell" is not captalized leads me to think that, perhaps, this is just a description and, if so, it would be improper to call the article that when we have the steadfast "Riddikulus" (it would be like having an article titled "that bushy-haired girl" instead of "Hermione Granger"). -- <small><span style="border:2px solid #333333;">[[User:Seth Cooper|<font style="color:#333333;">&nbsp;'''Seth Cooper'''&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Seth Cooper|<font style="background:#333333;color:white;">&nbsp;'''owl&nbsp;post!'''</font>]]</span></small> 01:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
  +
  +
:::That's what I was thinking as well... should I rename it "Riddikulus", then? --<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Bridgnorth" size="4" color="Indigo">Hunnie Bunn</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Bridgnorth" size="3" color="Indigo">Owl me!</font>]])</span> 01:34, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:34, 21 January 2013

Name?

The source given for this article's name is the HP Lexicon, which, while it's a very good fansite, is still a fansite. Has this spell been referred to as the Boggart-Banishing Spell in any source we consider canon? If not, it needs to be moved back to Riddikulus. -- 1337star (talk) 18:53, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Order of the Phoenix - chapter 31 (O.W.L.s). --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 18:58, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
"'Oh bravo!' cried Professor Tofty, who was examining Harry again, when Harry demonstrated a perfect boggart banishing spell."
— Harry Potter being awesome.[src]
Yes? It's not capitalized though, so should this be moved to "Boggart banishing spell"? -- 1337star (talk) 19:06, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Nom: Part Deux

GSnitch This discussion is listed as an active talk page.
Please remove this template when the question has been answered.

I understand that it is referred to as "boggart banishing spell" in the fifth book; however, this is not capitalized. So should we name this "Boggart banishing spell" all lower-case except the first word, or should we name it "Riddikulus", which is what Pottermore has it as? --Hunnie Bunn (Owl me!) 19:51, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

I think maybe the former, but let's see what some others think. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:11, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
The fact that "Boggart banishing spell" is not captalized leads me to think that, perhaps, this is just a description and, if so, it would be improper to call the article that when we have the steadfast "Riddikulus" (it would be like having an article titled "that bushy-haired girl" instead of "Hermione Granger"). --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 01:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
That's what I was thinking as well... should I rename it "Riddikulus", then? --Hunnie Bunn (Owl me!) 01:34, January 21, 2013 (UTC)