Light, non-verbal and wandless Edit

In the PS1 version, Quirrell nonverbally and wandlessly animates suits of armour to attack Harry. It manifestates in a green ball of light. As the effects are 100 % the same, should we take it asd Piertotum Loccomottor?--Rodolphus 14:59, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

I'd say so. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:02, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

He also conjures a suit of armour using itz.--Rodolphus 15:04, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Can the conjuration variant be canon?--Rodolphus 16:41, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Chesspieeces Edit

In the DH film, Minerva states "I´ve always wanted to use that spell," Is it just me, or does it indicate she never used it before? So the chesspiece animation must be different.--Rodolphus 10:01, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Agreed, it can't seem to mean anything elseGreen Zubat 10:08, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

The currrent article statement is just speculation. Canon suggests that Piertotum Locomotor wasn´t used on the chesspieces at all. Flitwick is pure speculation. I´ll remove it entirely.--Rodolphus 16:22, July 12, 2011 (UTC)