Fandom

Harry Potter Wiki

Talk:Painting of a hippopotamus

Back to page

14,587pages on
this wiki
Add New Page

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Painting vs Portrait

I think we should use portrait, seen as J. K. Rowling uses "portrait" to name moving pictures and "painting" to name still-lifes:

"The Hufflepuff common room is accessed through a portrait near the kitchens, as I am sure you have deduced. Sorry - I should say 'painting' rather than portrait, because it is a still-life."
—J.K. Rowling and the Live Chat, Bloomsbury.com, July 30, 2007 (2.00-3.00pm BST).

--  Seth Cooper  owl post! 13:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

A still life is a work of art that depicts only inanimate objects — food, flowers, books, etc. — rather than people or landscapes. Thus, when Rowling described the Hufflepuff common room's entry painting as a "still-life," she was indicating its subject matter, not that it was "still" in the sense of being unmoving and non-magical. A wizarding still life might very well be animated in some way: if it depicted a vase of flowers on a window sill, then a bee might buzz around, or a breeze rustle the curtains.
When it comes to the hippo, I think "painting" is a more appropriate description than "portrait," as "portrait" generally refers only to a painting of a person. Starstuff (Owl me!) 07:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki