What the Heck?

Why did you remove what I added, (User) Proffesor Tofty?Groxhugger (talk) 01:18, July 13, 2013 (UTC) Lord Voldemort

I didn't see it as relevant. Teacups are not necessarily a proscribed Muggle artefact. Also, just for future reference, when adding a "Behind the scenes", it should be capitalised that way, and not "Behind the Scenes". ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:24, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
Also for future reference, edit summaries, which most established editors leave when reverting an edit and as Prof. Tofty did leave in this case, can be found in the page history. -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 01:26, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
But, since the point of the MOMAO is to keep dangerous magical artifacts from being found by or sold to muggles, wouldn't the Nose-Biting Teacups need a permit to be sold. I think there should be something like this: "It is odd, considering that his father works in the Misuse of Muggle Artifacts Office, that Ron bought a nose-biting teacup, seeing as that would count as a muggle artifact. However, it could just be that Nose-Biting Teacups are allowed, under the condition that they sell none to muggles." Also, what's your citation for them not beinh considered a muggle artifact?Groxhugger (talk) 16:47, July 13, 2013 (UTC) Lord Voldemort P.S.: I know that it's poorley worded. I'm not saying to put it in Verbatim.
Personally I don't think it would need a permit to be sold, as it's only sold in wizarding shops, places only wizards and parents of wizards can go. And I also don't think it would be considered a Muggle artefact (a in America, E in England, and since we use British English, it's e). --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 16:57, July 13, 2013 (UTC)