Harry Potter Wiki

Talk:Molly Weasley's second cousin

Back to page

13,927pages on
this wiki

Shouldn't this page be labelled as not canon, and "Mafalda's mother" as well? Mafalda Hopkirk 03:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

No, he was mentioned in Philosopher's Stone by Ron, therefore this character is canon.-- 10:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


Squib? Seriously? If we're not going to label people like Ron as a blood-traitor, then we shouldn't label squibs as squibs. We're talking about blood purity! Not their magical abilities/choices! This character should be labeled as a pure-blood (or nothing if we find we have no actual proof that he was a pureblood, merely related to them). Also, if squib is merely speculation, then it should be taken off anyway. This isn't a place for speculations. -- 10:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

First of all, "blood traitor" is not a category of blood status -- it's more or less a political/ideological one, as it includes both pure-bloods and half-bloods who treat Muggles and Muggle-borns as their equals. Two, "Squib", on the other hand, is its own category of blood purity. Magical abilties are a significant part of blood purity (hence the difference between Muggles and Muggle-borns). Finally, the article itself states that the character could be either a pure-blood or a Squib, so as not to be overly speculative, although I think it's a fairly reasonable assumption to think someone born into the wizarding world who moved to the Muggle world might be a Squib. Oread (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki