How about this: [1] as the picture because it isn't on a funny angle.Lieutenant J.J 07:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Lieutenant J.J

Thanks alot Lieutenant J.J, Ive bin hoping that someone could get me a pic of old malfoys wand, so now ive edited it, but can anyone tell me how to put it in the wand info box, i couldnt find out how to do it, thanks again, - JACOBSMITH95

Sorry, but where does the information about the wand being made over a thousand years ago and previous masters come from?189.171.74.232 21:55, November 28, 2010 (UTC)Charles Estrada189.171.74.232 21:55, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

It comes from an interview with Jason Isaacs (that can be seen here). Have in mind that under this wiki's Canon policy films are a valid canon source, unless contadicted by the books or Rowling herself. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 22:24, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

uhh...not 2 B redundant, but what is the point of breaking off the handle? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.184.110.140 (talk • contribs).

Probably to further humiliate Lucius and his family. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 17:11, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't this article be named Lucius Malfoy's wand, and the fact it a family heirloom be in the article itself? Merlin. 07:22, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

All of this stuff about it being a family heirloom really needs to be cited in the article itself, ASAP and not just the infobox. It's floating a lot of facts that don't come from the books without good sourcing, and that's not a good idea. I may just do it myself when I have the chance if someone else doesn't get to it first. ProfessorTofty (talk) 03:42, February 3, 2013 (UTC)