Should that really be in the infobox? The films, Pottermore and Wonderbook: Book of Spells all use a different hand movement. -- ''[[User:PerryPeverell|PerryPeverell]]'' 00:03, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
Should that really be in the infobox? The films, Pottermore and Wonderbook: Book of Spells all use a different hand movement. -- ''[[User:PerryPeverell|PerryPeverell]]'' 00:03, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
:I wondered that earlier. After all, J. K. Rowling, who did the writing, ''wrote'' that it was supposed to look like a "J", according to Wonderbook. The films probably only did it the way they did because that was how they (and I, until ''[[Pottermore]]'', imagined it). Pottermore did the wand movements the way they felt like it, whatever way they wanted. So I'd have to say no, but I'd like to see what everyone else says first. --'''<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">Hunniebunn</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">talk</font>]])''' 00:10, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
:I wondered that earlier. After all, J. K. Rowling, who did the writing, ''wrote'' that it was supposed to look like a "J", according to Wonderbook. The films probably only did it the way they did because that was how they (and I, until ''[[Pottermore]]'', imagined it). Pottermore did the wand movements the way they felt like it, whatever way they wanted. So I'd have to say no, but I'd like to see what everyone else says first. --'''<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">Hunniebunn</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">talk</font>]])''' 00:10, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
+
+
::Pottermore did it just so you could duel with others. I don't think they actually put much thought it. Some movements seem silly for spells, taking to long to perform. -- ''[[User:PerryPeverell|PerryPeverell]]'' 18:38, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
Revision as of 18:38, 19 November 2012
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Moved from "Talk:Hover Charm" -- Seth Cooperowl post! 21:57, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
The hoover charm is Wingardium Leviosa, isn´t it? But I think the picture shown in the article is Levicorpus--Rodolphus 20:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I´ve removed all Levicorpus mentions now. Can´t anyone upload a moving image OFthe levitating feather in film 1?--Rodolphus 14:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Used
This spell was used non-verbally in the duel between Dumbeldore and Voldemort when Dumbeldore formed a dome of water around Voldemort he "levitates" the water it says in the article or was that another spell???
I corrected a missing link for "Harry Potter" just a minor edit, but I wanted to fix it. =) GinnyPi 02:41, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Levioso
The first source used in the article is from the Warner Bros. website, but the page on that website clearly refers to the Levioso (Levitation spell). It says that Levioso originated in England and so. (You can read it by yourself.)
So, since the source talks about the Levioso spell, I don't understand why is misused in this way. Even if we never heard of this spell in both the books and the films, the official website of the films should be considered canon. Can't we just create a page for Levioso and move the proper information there? --EXE.eseguibile 16:35, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Name
Both Pottermore and Wonderbook: Book of Spells refer to this spell as the Levitation Charm. Both use information straight from Rowling. Should we change the name, or should we wait for Chamber of Secrets on Pottermore and see how, if at all, it covers this issue? -- 1337star(Drop me a line!) 23:02, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
I'm for changing the name. It is the most recent source we're talking about, and it unquestionably had Rowling's input. -- Seth Cooperowl post! 23:26, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
New info from Pottermore: the Hover Charm's entry implies that it is a separate spell. Note that it is described as making objects "hover", whereas Wingardium Leviosa is almost always described as making objects "fly". I think a split is in order. -- 1337star(Drop me a line!) 20:30, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
1337star's comment about Wingardium Leviosa always being described as making the target fly made me wonder... is it possible that this is the Flying Charm mentioned in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix? I thought it made sense, since they both make the target fly and if one cast Wingardium Leviosa on a broomstick it'd presumably have a similar effect to the Flying Charm. Also, they're both charms. Just wondered...Hunnie Bunn (talk) 15:54, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
There's a distinct difference, though. The Levitation Charm (as I will be so bold to call it now) makes objects (other than people) fly at control of the caster as long as the spell is focused on it. The Flying Charm allows an object to fly at control of a rider, and is presumably permanent. -- 1337star(Drop me a line!) 17:06, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
I see. Thank you for helping me understand that, it was confusing me for a while. As I said, I was just curious. By the way, if y$ou need help with anything, just send me an owl or something. Hunnie Bunn (talk) 17:18, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
Hover Charm/Levitation Charm
Hey everyone. I'm still a bit tired (it's only nine o'clock) but I wanted to have another go at splitting Wingardium Leviosa and the Hover Charm, as nobody has raised any complaints about the split and all that needs to be done is the doing itself. I tried to do so last night, but unfortunately my edit was reverted before I could finish the Hover Charm page (a shame, as I thought it looked quite good. Anywho, if anything gets really messed up, it's just me. I am, yours most sincerely, Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore(talk)
Where Did Wingardium Leviosa Go?
Thanks, Seth, for sorting that out. Unfortunately, despite many attempts to find Wingardium Leviosa, all attempts redirected here. Do you know what happened to Wingardium Leviosa, or should I perhaps create a new page? Again, many thanks. Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore (talk) 15:57, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
OWL
Er... I just re-read my copy of Order of the Phoenix, and I realized that they do use this in their OWLs... "His Levitation Charm was certainly much better than Malfoy's had been..." (text was not bolded, I did so to emphasise my point that it was this spell and not Levioso that was used. I actually wondered whether anyone could please help find a way to integrate this fact into the article, because every way I've tried just sounded odd. Thanks :) --Hunniebunn (talk) 23:14, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
Hand movement
Should that really be in the infobox? The films, Pottermore and Wonderbook: Book of Spells all use a different hand movement. -- PerryPeverell 00:03, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
I wondered that earlier. After all, J. K. Rowling, who did the writing, wrote that it was supposed to look like a "J", according to Wonderbook. The films probably only did it the way they did because that was how they (and I, until Pottermore, imagined it). Pottermore did the wand movements the way they felt like it, whatever way they wanted. So I'd have to say no, but I'd like to see what everyone else says first. --Hunniebunn (talk) 00:10, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
Pottermore did it just so you could duel with others. I don't think they actually put much thought it. Some movements seem silly for spells, taking to long to perform. -- PerryPeverell 18:38, November 19, 2012 (UTC)