FANDOM


If a healer is the wizarding equivalent to a doctor, what is the wizarding equivalent to a lawyer? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marcos Imbillicieri (talkcontribs).

Engorio

I think it should have a heading saying engorgio (this article needs to be expanded) on it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.81.221.237 (talkcontribs).


Then add one (or, even better, add what information you think is missing). This is a wiki, you don't have to ask permission to make an edit. Just put
  at the top of the article. However, I personally feel that about all the information that could be on this article is already there, except maybe a list of Healers. 1337star21:25, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (book) - at Saint Mungo's Since Poppy Pomphrey could be considered a Healer, it could be books 1-6


Infobox?

GSnitch This discussion is listed as an Active Talk Page.
Please remove this template when the question has been answered.

Should this article actually have an organisation infobox? Healers themselves are not an organisation, they are trained people who work for different organisations.--Rodolphus (talk) 18:32, August 25, 2018 (UTC)

So it looks like this wiki does not have a "occupation infobox," and {{Organisation infobox}} is in fact used as such for other jobs, such as Auror, Hit Wizard, Dragon killer, Snake Charmer, and Vampire Hunter. The fact that the majority of the pages on Category:Jobs doesn't use any infoboxes is probably why there isn't one, so the organisation one was used instead. There's also another possible suitable template {{Official post infobox}}, but I imagine the other infobox was used due to the parameters being more relevant. IDK. This is something you can probably bring up to an Admin, because it wasn't only this page particular that's using that infobox for jobs. --Sammm✦✧(talk) 19:21, August 25, 2018 (UTC)

Training?

Should we have a separate article for Haler training, öole the one we have for Auror training? Though it would be a short one.--Rodolphus (talk) 16:32, August 25, 2018 (UTC)

I don't think that it's worth an article due to the shortage of concrete information on the subject  Maester Martin (talk) 18:15, August 25, 2018 (UTC)