Talk:Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (film)
From Harry Potter Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Lupin's luggage (the portmanteau)?
Is this the film that features Lupin's (at least, I think it was his) big fold-out trunk? He packs it with a wave of the wand at the end of the year, I think: the trunk is open and on its end, coats hanging in one side, drawers in the other. Am I remembering correctly? Does this ring a bell for anyone? Thanks; Sam. 202.81.18.30 04:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm. No I don't remember that at all. Are you sure? ShirleyA
(The Quibbler) 08:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
This is what I remember: Lupin flicks his wand to pack his fold out trunk that has like the above user said the trunk is open and on its end, coats hanging in one side, drawers in the other. After he does this he says:
- Remus Lupin: "I have looked worse."
- Harry Potter: "You're sacked"
- Remus Lupin: "Remus Lupin"
- — No, No, resigned[src]
- Am I right? -- Madam Hooch
(Which Broomstick)
- Yes, you are right Madam Hooch. It was in the last part of this movie Prisoner of Azkaban. By the way Sam, Why do you ask about it? --ÈnŔîčö
(Send me an Owl!) 09:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The glass of wine
Harry destroys Aunt Marge's glass of wine
I don't actually think the broken glass already was Harry's fault. I think that was entirely Marge's fault. She said she had a strong grip and that it had happened before. At least she says so in the novel. --Maxl 09:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- In both the book and the film, Marge insults Harry's mother, and it makes him so angry that he unintentionally breaks the glass through underage magic. ★ Starstuff (Owl me!) 09:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] We can't be seen!
Hermoine said to Harry that they can't be seen. Exactley they are been seen by someone. They are been seen by one men: Albus Dumbledore. If Harry and Hermoine come back, they talk to Dumbledore, who just has talked to the past Harry and Hermoine. Is this a blooper or not? Or is this not a blooper?--Station7 10:30, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
- They couldn't be seen by people who weren't aware of their time-travelling. Imagine Ron saw two Hermiones and two Harrys: he would think he was mad! Now, Dumbledore was aware they were time-travelling there was no harm done. The only blooper I think happened is Macnair: he was sitting at the Clock Tower Courtyard, as such he saw Harry, Ron and Hermione and the time-travelling Harry and Hermione, minutes after their earlier selves passed by him. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 12:41, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
But Sirius Black so Harry and Hermoine to, but he didn't know they saved Buckbeak!--Station7 22:24, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Sirius saw them but there were no worries, as he never knew there were another pair of Harrys and Hermiones at that same moment at the Hospital Wing. -- Seth Cooper owl post! 23:21, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] If I understand then....
If I do understand, the time-travelling Harry and Hermoine already saved Buckbeak, so he didn't die! My question is: Were they already time-travelling from the beginning when Harry, Ron and Hermoine were going to Hagrid, is that right. Could you explain more? Thanks.--Station7 18:51, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
Am I right?--Station7 18:56, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I've seen the movie, but how could that Seth Cooper?--Station7 20:31, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
- It seems that time travel is allowable as long as history isn't changed. The travel itself and its consequences have to be part of history already. The trio never saw the execution of Buckbeak, all they saw was the executioner using the axe, they heard Hagrid's cry but didn't hear the words. They just thought that Buckbeak had been killed. Hagrid, Fudge, Macnair and Dumbledore must have seen that Buckbeak had "disappeared" right in the first time. So yes, I think that their time travelling selves had already meddled with the execution. Another example of this is the vase breaking at Hagrid's: it breaks when the original Harry and Hermione, and then the time travelling Hermione realizes she has to do it. Loads of paradoxes innit? -- Seth Cooper owl post! 23:36, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Cool!--Station7 07:22, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] 3 Harry's and 3 Hermoines?
I look some video's at youtube and I thought there were 3 Harry's at the same moment. 1. The Harry and Hermoine and the Hospital Wing. 2. The Time-travelling Harry and Hermoine who were going to Hagrid. 3. The Harry and Hermoine who were running to the Hospital Wing. Yes, it's strange what I think, but what do you think about this. Of were there just 2 Harry's and Hermoines?--Station7 07:40, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
No, you saw only two of each. The Harry and Hermione traveling through time are exactly the same as those in the Hospital Wing. Of course, time is a cycle of endless paradoxes and so Harry and Hermione are constantly repeating this cycle of time-travel if you follow the events of each pair on their own. Does that make sense?--Yin&Yang 07:49, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that's make sense.--Station7 08:08, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
