Recent rollbackEdit

I have reverted the previous edits, and wanted to give my reasons. Firstly, I feel that a plot/walkthrough is not appropriate to this wiki - we are not a gaming site and previous walkthroughs have been deleted. Secondly, every word in the text was capitalised, and looked ugly. With over 4,000 bytes being added to the article, that's a lot of work for anyone to try and decapitalise.

Maybe instead of having walkthroughs on the video game pages, we link to appropriate sites, such as www.gamefaqs.com, which have them instead?

Does anyone have any thoughts on this matter? - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree its inappropriate for this site. We are an encyclopedia after all. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 16:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

GBA/GBCEdit

I have played Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (or Sorcerer's, at least, I'm fairly sure it doesn't matter, though) on both the GameBoy Advance and GameBoy Color (and Play Station, but anyway) and I think they should each have their own columns. Although both are based off of the same movie, they are too vastly different games. Er, opinions? Eleanor Rigby | talk | contribs23:53, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

I agree.

PS1Edit

A Raveclaw student tells Harry after the Herbology classes that they let even first years into the Quidditch. Also, there's no chasing after remembrall, either.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) 14:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)