Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Rated R?

Does anyone think it will be rated R? And if not, what?

Seeing as its a kids film, I doubt it would be an R. But as the film doesnt come out for another three years this whole conversations pointless. - Vaysey ^{– Gryffindor} 15:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

There is a possibility it will be R. At least PG 13...-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 19:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Why in the world word it be rated R? --Lupin & Kingsley 23:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree, especially if you don't have any proof to back this claim up. -Adv193 16:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Matoro was just saying it was possible that it will be rated R in response to somebody else's question. He never said that it was definitively going to be rated R; it's his opinion, not a "claim" requiring proof.

While I personally doubt it will receive this rating, considering the audience for the novels, it is possible -- R ratings are typically given for violence, especially violence that includes blood. Deathly Hallows includes scenes of Harry and Ron losing teeth (Harry in the Battle over Little Whinging, Ron when he's punched by a Snatcher), which has to be bloody; Ron severely bleeds from being Splinched; Hermione gets tortured (even if they don't show it directly, as in the book, it's an extremely violent and disturbing act); Harry gets bitten by a snake after it comes out of a corpse (again, disturbing); numerous characters die... There's a lot of violence in Deathly Hallows, and I can't see the filmmakers being able to depict the Battle of Hogwarts as bloodless, even if curses tend to make deaths a little 'cleaner', as it were.

However, nobody has "proof" about the rating, seeing as the films won't be coming out for years (as Vaysey already pointed out). Oread 16:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Matoro I never mint to accuse you of saying that it will be rated R, sorry about that. --Lupin & Kingsley 20:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Two Articles

When the films are closer, should this article be split in two? RaggieSoft 04:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

There are two films, so I definately think that the articles should be split in two at some point. --Freakatone 12:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

well what I dont understand is why they are spliting it into 2 movies??? --Its_A_Sammy 12:53, 23 May 2008

There's too much important information in the final book. If they cut out/alter too much, the movie loses its faithfulness to the novel. And they can't fit everything into, call it, a two and a half hour movie. --Cubs Fan2007 19:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree, we should split this article into two pages. ----ÈnŔîčö ^{(Send me an Owl)} 11:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I also agree --Hellabore ^{(Deathly Hallows)(contribs)}

I personally think the article should be split when we know where the films will be split -Smonocco 12:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Smonocoo --Hellabore ^{(Deathly Hallows)(contribs)}