Should this article really be called "Half-breeds." That's a term Dolores Umbridge used to insult and demean totally normal people who weren't the same as her. It seems wrong. Mafalda Hopkirk 07:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it seems that it is the only "official" term we have for it. Perhaps rewriting the article to make it clear that it is a demeaning term (like Mudblood) would suffice? - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 11:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

how long do thisTraits last

I was wondering how long do thisTraits last i mean we Know for Fleur it is at least two Gerntaions but what of others

Raven Darkholme 07:47, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Why does it say that Half-goblins are more clever then humans because of their goblin ancestry although it says that humans are more inteligent then goblins? Is it a mistake on the wikipedia, inconsistency in books or there is some difference between clevernes and inteligence?

Page move

Should we move this article to part-human? Given the context it has been used in, half-breed seems to be used only as an insult. Part-human seems to be the politically correct term. (Guideline for the treatment of non-wizard part humans is a Ministry regulation).--Rodolphus (talk) 09:17, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Bumping.--Rodolphus (talk) 08:58, January 23, 2016 (UTC)
Bumping. --Rodolphus (talk) 15:01, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
I have no issue with that, as long as "Half-breed" is left as a redirect. --Sajuuk 15:17, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

It would be kept. What do the others think?--Rodolphus (talk) 15:23, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

I do have an issue, because "half-breeds" aren't necessarily part-humans. The page, as you can see, also covers other crossbreeds, such as cats that are part-Kneazles, the Blast-Ended Skrewts, and hypothetical crossbreeds between species that can both breed with humans (e.g. a half-vampire, half-goblin).