"Little is known about their biology."

This is a fact. Please leave this quote in the article so that there is an explination to the readers why so much about then (e.g. how they reproduce etc.), is not written in the article.



Just wondered, where does the image come from? If it isn't canon it should probably be removed. Also, a lot of the article is made up of stuff that we only know from the real world, not from the Harry Potter series - I was under the impression that wasn't allowed. --Hunniebunn 23:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

If the image has proper sourcing information, you can visit the page for it to see where it comes from. According to the file page, it comes from the Prisoner of Azkaban video game and as such is canon. If you can't recall seeing a particular image from one of the movies, then the video games are a likely source. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:04, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
That's true. Would it be all right, though, if I put a clean-up tag on the article? It's a bit messy in my opinion. --Hunniebunn 00:14, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
If you like, but if you do, I'd prefer if you also start a new section here on the talk page stating what things you feel could be improved. I'm not in favour of cleanup tags without explanation. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:17, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

Why I Think The Article Should Be Cleaned Up, By Hunniebunn

There's really a lot of things (I think) that are wrong with the article; unsourced claims, information about specific topics spread all across the article like butter on a sandwich, and next to no sub-headings to provide organisation. I'm going to start cleaning up once I publish this, the sooner to get the tag off. --Hunniebunn 00:27, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

The article has no Notes and references section whatsoever - a good start would be to get some sources in there and get that section into there. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:36, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

Language translations

I thought there was some kind of rule on here prohibiting the use of translations as canon, but in French, "hag" is translated as "harpie"; could this be canon? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 22:55, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

Oui, c'est vrai! :D - Yes, that's true. Look this link to the French wiki.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 13:52, April 17, 2014 (UTC)