Should this article really have a speculation section? Seems to me like if it isn't canon it shouldn't go in the article at all. Jayce Carver 
Talk 22:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
The rules really only state that fanon is discouraged from this site. As the War brought about by Gellert Grindelwald is such a vague article, I thought a speculation section would both make it more interesting, and more meaningful. I could be wrong though, the only thing one can really speculate about it is its connection to World War II. It's not fan-based information so I thought it was alright.
Imperial Misanthrope 
11:46pm, 21st April 2009
- It isn't information at all, which is surely just as bad as fan-based information. Speculation should be restricted to there being most of the required information in place, and then the editors of this wiki filling in the gaps. Not simply saying "X happened at the same time as Y, therefore they are related" which doesn't hold. Azraphon 08:28, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Title
The name in the infobox is European Wizarding War and the top title is just Revolution. Shouldn't this be titled "European Wizarding Revolution?" --JKoch(Owl Me!) 14:14, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
quick question
when was this mentioned in the first book22:24, July 4, 2010 (UTC)22:24, July 4, 2010 (UTC)22:24, July 4, 2010 (UTC)~