It seems very unlikely to me that she got her wand from Ollivander's, given that Harry's wand cost 7 galleons and the Weasleys did not have nearly as much money in their vault at that time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs).
- It's possible that allowances are made for such situations. Also, the Weasleys don't much money, but they aren't necessarily poor. We know that obviously they had to get the books second-hand, but they save for some things, and it is possible that they could have saved to get the wand new. ProfessorTofty (talk) 20:41, March 9, 2013 (UTC)