Talk: Fred and George Weasley

Spliting this article may be desired.

could we split this in to two individual articles for Fred and George. it's very unencyclopedic to have one article for both of them as if they are a single being. just saying Valin "Tnu" "Shido" Suul 17:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

I agree...but at the same time wouldn't all the information be the same? Also, when reference from other articles usually refer to both "Fred and George". -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 21:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Not always. Plus, their lives veer off differently. I support moving them apart. Syu

Even if they're similar, they are still two different people. And I'm not quite sure how one dying and the other having his ear blown off qualifies as being the same information. :) Ryangibsonstewart 01:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant to say "most of the information", "all" was meant to be an exaggeration. But I think you're missing the point of my comment - the majority of the beginning information is the same, it only really becomes different in the last couple books. Besides I already said I support, I'm just trying to make sure we take everything into consideration. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

 Me agree cut fred some slack he just died you know!!!(Talk)4:45 Aug.16,2007

Interesting idea, although I am used to "Fred and George" since they are usually together RaggieSoft 21:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

They are the bets characters other than Sirius Black and should have their own pages

I agree, it should be separate Wiking 17:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• I agree as well: they should be separate- especially after the 7th book. NighthawkLeader 01:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah we should do that but we should add more stuff to the articles

Support

Well, though they look alike, they are two entirely different people (OK, so physically they'r the same but you know what I mean) 74.36.214.81 22:46, August 20 2007