Talk:Emma Watson

Shouldn't this page only be on Wikipedia? It is clearly a copy and can be easily hotlinked back to the main site. Besides, this person didn't actually appear in any of the books and only is the actor of a character, and they are not an actual character themselves. 69.81.178.253 00:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Scandles

Shouldn't there be a section on this page, which explains or gives info on some of the related scandles to her? There are a lot of pictures of her with, lets say, not enough clothes on, but some may be photoshoped images. I'm not saying display these reveiling images but just show how the poporatsi have stired things up. You know a kind of thing to tell fans that she's got dignity and that the fake pictures of her on various sites are fakes and not actually real. Just a thoguht. Regards, the parkster

I think someone should definitely add a "Scandals" section, which could include the paparazzi pics, not visually, but as a mention.--Timbira^{(Luna Lovegood)} 05:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Trust me, they are ALL photoshopped. 24.184.206.83 19:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I think this falls under the category of "Don't go there". If some huge media eruption occurs, then that's one thing. Otherwise, it's not appropriate. It is not unique for there to be fakes out there of Emma. There are fakes of everybody. I came across one of Alan Rickman (as Snape) awhile back that made me want to drink turpentine. 23skidoo 01:06, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Why did she want to do that?

Why was Emma considering quiting for Half-Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows?--Bella Goth 18:38, July 28, 2010 (UTC)Bella Goth

Main Image Change

I think, and I don't care WHATEVER picture it is, that the main image HAS to be changed. That is NOT the Emma Watson I know and love, and we should use another. Here are my ideas. Ferbot 13:38, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Current Image

Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

Support

Image 2

1. Secret agent clank