Is this article really necessary? For one, it repeats (but isn't as expansive as) the Duel article. I also thought we were discontinuing the practice of having lists (such as eliminating the list of pure-blood families). Furthermore, some things in the list are not even duels (e.g. Harry and a dragon). Oread 20:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I have to agree. I think we should redirect it to Duel; "duel" is the act itself, while "duelling" is the act of participating. --Cubs Fan2007 21:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this actually spelt as "Dueling" anyway? (Which redirects to "Duel" by the way). And I agree, merge & redirect. Lists are not always frowned upon, but when they can be replaced by a category they are. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 04:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Was going to merge this article, but had an Idea, and wanted to run it by. The main article isn't large at all,and would be sinple to merge. The list though, should it probably have it's own page on a table? That could be something I could work on making, just wondered what others thought. HPguru 03:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
It should definitely be put into a table...I'm not sure about being on its own page though. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 13:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I think it should stay on this page. It really doesn't need its own page.--Matoro183 (Talk) 21:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I just added many of the duels listed in this article (the ones I actually thought were duels, thus I excluded ones such as Harry vs. a dragon) to the Duel article as a rather extensive table. Maybe too extensive, actually. I'm now redirecting this page to that article. Oread 01:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Could we add the duels from Fantastic Beast here? Ninclow (talk) 19:40, November 21, 2016 (UTC)