No edit summary |
Hunnie Bunn (talk | contribs) (→Seriously?: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Would it be worth to create an infobox for Death? [[User:Quirinus Quirrell]] |
Would it be worth to create an infobox for Death? [[User:Quirinus Quirrell]] |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Seriously? == |
||
| + | |||
| + | "...Death might actually be a [[Thestral]]..." Really? I somehow find it hard to believe that a Thestral would be capable of making a wand, or plucking a tail out of its own back end, or talking human, or being comprehensible to a human, ''or ''being able to put an invisibility cloak onto itself? No offense, but as smart as the theory is, I find it just a tad ludicrous to think that Death is a Thestral. No offense. [[User:Hunnie Bunn|Hunnie Bunn]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|talk]]) 00:16, August 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:16, 8 August 2012
How would you classify death as a character? Would he be a wizard? I am not sure which infobox should be used. -- Hellabore
(Deathly Hallows)
I think it is possible to give it a Individual infobox. Does anyone agree? -- Hellabore(Deathly Hallows)
- Yes I think an individual infobox would be the most appropriate. Perhaps in the Behind the Scenes section we could mention that it is unclear what sort of "being" Death is, or whether he is a being at all. I might do that now if that's okay. --Margiechocoholic
Owl me! 02:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Sure! -- Hellabore(Deathly Hallows)
Would it be worth to create an infobox for Death? User:Quirinus Quirrell
Seriously?
"...Death might actually be a Thestral..." Really? I somehow find it hard to believe that a Thestral would be capable of making a wand, or plucking a tail out of its own back end, or talking human, or being comprehensible to a human, or being able to put an invisibility cloak onto itself? No offense, but as smart as the theory is, I find it just a tad ludicrous to think that Death is a Thestral. No offense. Hunnie Bunn (talk) 00:16, August 8, 2012 (UTC)