Shouldn't this article just be redirected to Boa Constrictor they are both about the same thing because the one at the zoo is the only one isn't it? --Bongo2009Talk 19:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
I think the Boa constrictor article is about the animal in general; this article is about a specific one. So I think they should remain separate. --Cubs Fan2007(Talk to me) 20:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Did J. K. Rowling really confirm that the boa Harry set free was actually Nagini? Or is it just another trick by newbie editors? Somebody tell me. --MrSmartyMax 18:17, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
Is this really still going around? ಠ_ಠ (Note: I'm not attempt to be insulting or condescending, just thought this nonsense was over with by now. Sorry if it comes off that way.) -- 1337star (Owl Post) 18:48, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
Should we change the article name to Snake at the Zoo to be fair to the film, despite it is a non-canon python? --Danniesen 17:31, March 12, 2012 (Denmark)
No need to be "fair to the film", the fact that the snake was a python is a canonical falsehood at any rate; does not need to be acknowledged. -- Seth Cooperowl post! 17:22, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know who voiced it? I used to think it sounded a bit like the sorting hat, so maybe it was Leslie Phillips? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.8.131.52 (talk • contribs).