Wikia

Harry Potter Wiki

Talk:Bast

12,003pages on
this wiki

Back to page

Stuff

GSnitch This discussion is listed as an Active Talk Page.
Please remove this template when the question has been answered.

Just wondering, since "Bast" (or "Bastet") is a "real" goddess worshipped in Egypt, should the "real-life" template be applied to the article? Or (no disrespect to any Egyptians) is that not allowed? Where I live we aren't allowed referencing religious figures as "real" in case atheists or followers of other religions get offended. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 22:49, November 21, 2014 (UTC)

At the moment, none of the pages in the category Deities employs the "real-life" template. I would understand the potential issues of calling deities of any kind real, but then again, the subject of their existence as a concept is real (as in, they are real subjects, even if they in themselves are arguably real/not real). For instance, in this sense, Bast would be a real-life subject whereas some sort of Harry Potter-specific in-universe deity that ancient Egyptian wizards worshipped would not be. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 02:48, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
So is it okay if I remove the template from "Jesus Christ"? In my opinion, it's just as debatable as having that template on any deity, but that's just me. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 12:44, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
I think you may have misunderstood me. What I said is that we should put the "real-life" template on the articles referring to any deity that comes from real-world mythology and/or religion, to distinguish them from any potential in-universe deities (which we don't know of, at the moment, but still, I wouldn't find it odd if there were wizard-specific religions).
On the matter of Jesus, virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically, so that wouldn't be an issue. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 15:11, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki