This page should be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talkcontribs).

Well isn't that great? You write "This page should be deleted", don't give any valid reasons, in fact, you don't give ANY reasons and then you blank the whole page just like that. So it's a stub. So nobody has written anything in it so far. That doesn't justify a drastic action such as blanking the page. If you had taken the trouble to rewrite it or even do as little as add to it, it would have been better, but no, you have to blank the page. Unless or until you give a valid reason for deleting the article, going through the proper process like inserting a {{delete}} or {{db}} template, etc. I am going to keep that article the way it was before you decided to blank it on a whim, like or no like. The Chosen One (Choose me!) 01:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Obviously a newbie mistake, cut him some slack. John Reaves (talk) 03:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
It is attitudes like the above that prevents me from doing any more editing to improve this Wiki; i was stomped on one time too many

Shouldn't Golpalott's Third Law be mentioned here?

Eh.. forgot to sign that... --Tesko 06:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Added to the "See also" section. Good catch. - Nick O'Demus 06:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)