Seth Cooper (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
These users are able to delete and protect pages along with blocking users. |
These users are able to delete and protect pages along with blocking users. |
||
| − | ===[[User:Speedysnitch]] (+ |
+ | ===[[User:Speedysnitch]] (+6)=== |
I would like to nominate Speedysnitch for administrator, with the decreasing activity of Matoro183. She is an active user, who typically edits daily, and is making the best of the wiki when possible. |
I would like to nominate Speedysnitch for administrator, with the decreasing activity of Matoro183. She is an active user, who typically edits daily, and is making the best of the wiki when possible. |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
#Given her continued regular editing, I say yes. My only concern was the possible lack of activity and now that she's on here regularly, thats not an issue anymore. It'd be ashamed for this to be closed, simply from lack of voting. Come on, people, get involved! [[User:ProfessorTofty|ProfessorTofty]] 00:02, May 8, 2012 (UTC) |
#Given her continued regular editing, I say yes. My only concern was the possible lack of activity and now that she's on here regularly, thats not an issue anymore. It'd be ashamed for this to be closed, simply from lack of voting. Come on, people, get involved! [[User:ProfessorTofty|ProfessorTofty]] 00:02, May 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
#Fairly active and a good editor. You'll hear no complaints from me! -- <small><span style="border:2px solid #333333;">[[User:Seth Cooper|<font style="color:#333333;"> '''Seth Cooper''' </font>]][[User talk:Seth Cooper|<font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> '''owl post!'''</font>]]</span></small> 00:45, May 8, 2012 (UTC) |
#Fairly active and a good editor. You'll hear no complaints from me! -- <small><span style="border:2px solid #333333;">[[User:Seth Cooper|<font style="color:#333333;"> '''Seth Cooper''' </font>]][[User talk:Seth Cooper|<font style="background:#333333;color:white;"> '''owl post!'''</font>]]</span></small> 00:45, May 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | #She's a very helpful editor. I think she deserves the chance. <br/><small><span style="border:1px solid #E56717;">[[User:Harry granger|<font style="background:#F75D59;color:black;"> '''Harry granger''' </font>]][[User talk:Harry granger|<font style="background:#gold;color:black;"> ''' Talk '''</font>]]<font style="background:#EAC117;color:;"> [[Special:Contributions/Harry granger|'''contribs''']]</font></span></small> 07:24, May 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
====Against==== |
====Against==== |
||
Revision as of 07:24, 8 May 2012
This page is used to request various levels of user access. See the archive and history for old requests.
Chat Mods
Rollback
These users are able to quickly revert vandalism.
Administrator
These users are able to delete and protect pages along with blocking users.
User:Speedysnitch (+6)
I would like to nominate Speedysnitch for administrator, with the decreasing activity of Matoro183. She is an active user, who typically edits daily, and is making the best of the wiki when possible.
Head of Ravenclaw | Send me an Owl! 22:13, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Voting will end 0:00 UTC 13 May, 2012
For
- I know Speedy on other wiki's and can vouch for the maturity and I see her editing here a lot and is quite helpful, I support this assuming there is in fact an administrator position available. BachLynn23 Send me an Owl! The worst failure, is the failure to try. 23:10,4/22/2012
- Head of Ravenclaw | Send me an Owl! 22:07, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- I think Speedy would be a fine administrator. Marktheseeker 21:54, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Given her continued regular editing, I say yes. My only concern was the possible lack of activity and now that she's on here regularly, thats not an issue anymore. It'd be ashamed for this to be closed, simply from lack of voting. Come on, people, get involved! ProfessorTofty 00:02, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Fairly active and a good editor. You'll hear no complaints from me! -- Seth Cooper owl post! 00:45, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
- She's a very helpful editor. I think she deserves the chance.
Harry granger Talk contribs 07:24, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
Against
Discussion
- Do we know if she's even interested in the position? Her profile lists her as only "slightly active" at the moment, though she has in general been editing much more recently. Still, an admin, particularly one on such a busy wiki, should be someone who is reasonably active. Other than that, I don't really have any objections- her contributions are good and she's a chat mod, so she's already shown that she can be trusted with authority. ProfessorTofty 02:57, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy has accepted the nomination. - Nick O'Demus 21:57, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- I should've noted that I spoke with speedy on chat about it, and is willing to become an administrator. She is an rb + chat mod, is extremely helpful, etc. Head of Ravenclaw | Send me an Owl! 22:09, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm extending the ending date for this nom til the 13th of May. Two votes really isn't enough to gather consensus for an admin candidate, so please vote either way. If no more votes are made by then, I'll close it as unsuccessful due to lack of votes. Cheers, grunny@talk:~$ 14:28, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
Bureaucrat
These users are able to grant adminship, and grant and remove rollback privileges.