Cubs Fan2007 - I wanted to request rollback rights. I think I've got a pretty good track record with my edits, and I can't see anything that would suggest you can't trust me; since joining these wikis, I have not made personal attacks against anyone, and I've contributed positively to the encyclopedia(s).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Karu - the good candidat for administrator. I have a lot positive opinion Karu. IMO Karu will be good candidat for administrator, because he's good mediator, he has big knowledge wiki and he is administrator on pl-HP wiki, and he good fill the bill on PL-HP Wiki. I'm waiting for Karu accept. Ania,,FreeBird'' 14:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes I accept my candidature. Thanks FreeBird:) Karutalk 14:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Next to I called for on administrator, en Harry Potter Wiki, since I need sysop, to stem vandalism. Best regards Karutalk 19:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC).
Against - Not very many edits and not very active in the community...-Matoro183(Talk) 00:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Against - Same as above (no offense) NighthawkLeader 08:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Against - As per Matoro183 and Nighthawk leader. Also, I believe that we have enough active administrators at the moment. If you wish to help combat vandalism, I would advise applying for rollback rights instead. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 12:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Support - Good candidat for administrator. Ania,,FreeBird'' 21:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Rejected - Sorry Karu. If you have any other questions I'm sure those who participated would help with what they feel you need to work on. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 01:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Sure hope no one else wanted to voice their opinion because Chosen One has already pressed the button. John Reaves(talk) 21:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Okay, this is a formality meant to appease some of the more or less senior members on this wiki. I will be moving to Germany this Saturday, the 15th of September. Since it will take a few months to get my internet connected on that end, the Harry Potter Wiki will have only one crat (User:John Reaves) available to handle user rights requests etc. for that many months. In the event that John gets sick or inconvenienced or (God forbid) killed, there will be nobody to handle user rights requests on this wiki. Part of the reason why John requested he be promoted in the first place was so that the community would not have to bother Wikia staff anymore with promotions if the only available bureaucrat was absent. Thus, I have decided to appoint User:DarkJedi613 as a temporary bureaucrat in my place for the length of my absence; his status will be reverted to administrator once I return unless you, the community, have decided by that time to have him promoted permanently. I have discussed the matter with Wikia staff, and they have given me the go-ahead already, but this small discussion has proven itself necessary among some of our members.
Now, in the name of fairness (and also to appease the warmer tempers in the community) please state your opinions regarding said temporary arrangement. And, on a related note, I would also like to take this opportunity to formally propose the policy that this wiki should have at least two bureaucrats at any given time to supervise it. The reasons are stated above. Any comments would be much appreciated. TheChosenOne(Choose me!) 09:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I like that idea. DarkJedi is a good fit for a temporary or even permanent stay there. I think that was a wise choice. Syugecin.
Aye. DarkJedi's got my support, he's a good editor and user, and always willing to help. - Cavalier One 11:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Hi-
I'd like to request the position of administrator or beaurucrat. If this is acceptable you may email me at harry.malfoylover@gmail.com.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gryff23 (talk • contribs).
Against Almost all edits are on the Leaky Cauldron forum, only 2 article edits...-Matoro183(Talk - Jimmy Fincher talk) 17:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Against I agree with Matoro and Cavalier. --Freakatone(Talk) 19:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Rejected Sorry, try working on the things mentioned above. Remember that only trusted and experienced editors are given approval for permissions. Also, as of right now we have more than enough Beaurucrats and Administrators. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 22:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Not enough experience in making edits to article space. -Starstuff 23:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Same as all above NighthawkLeader 11:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Freakatone-- I wanted to request rollback rights so I can clear up vandalism quickly. It says that it's given out freely so I thought, what the heck? I might as well try. So here are some things about me and HP wiki:
I have over 700 edits (80% on the main Wiki).
I've been here for almost ten months, so I know what's going on.
I am a consistent user, I try to get on every day.
I haven't been warned for adding fanon or anything...
So, basically, I wanted to request this. That's pretty much all I have to say and so I guess I'll let you guys make your desicion now. Thanks. --Freakatone(Talk) 20:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, about that. I was actually going to give it to you the other day, but it seems that the page is down right now. Once I get a chance to ask John about it I'll take care of it. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 00:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!! Wow! What a nice birthday suprise! --Freakatone(Talk)01:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Haha. No problem. Stay tuned. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 01:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Support Productive contributor with a consistently high standard of contributions. -Starstuff 01:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Gryff23 I'd like to request permission for being a rollback.
I am a obsessive user. I try and log on every day.
I,regretably, have been warned of fanon, but I was a new user then, and now know better.
Again, I regret, I had been warned of a regretable comment on DarkJedi's page. But at first I thought that was him. But I have ADHD, so I do things that I don't mean to do and don't realise there are consequences.
I have made edits on some of the actors pages.
I have helped undo the recent vandalism.
So, thanks and I'll let you guys make your desicion. Gryff23 00:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Support You got off to a bad start, but have made some improvements...Matoro183Talk 01:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Support Has improved ALOT. -- FreakatoneTalk 11:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Support Proved very helpful in the move to set things right after Friday's vandalism. -Starstuff 12:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Therequiembellishere Now that summer is here, I can certainly help fight the incoming vandalism from Knox's death, the HBP film and the prequel. I'm very experienced with rollback on en.wikipedia and the inheritence cycle wiki. Therequiembellishere 10:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would like to apply for Adminship because I believe that I am a trusted member of the wiki. I have been editing here for nearly 11 months, have made over 1500 edits and am currently the 6th highest user of this wiki according to Wiki stats(the highest non admin apart from Starstuff who has retired from editing this wiki). If I was an administrator I could help make this great wiki into an even better wiki by blocking vandals and deleting unwanted and useless articles. I would also use the position of leadership to welcome new users and help them out. Me_Potter_Fan(Talk) 09:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
For (4 votes)
Support: A great user who is friendly to everyone and whose edits are always of a great quality. (And ironically, according to the stats page, we both made our first edit on the same day) -- FreakatoneTalk 10:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Support: Lots of major edits, very active, probably the best choice...--Matoro183(Talk) 16:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Support: Someone who really deserves this position. Mlbpiggirl 21:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Support: Good edit count, very responsible, deserves it. Palmala 11:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Against (0 votes)
Comments
Techinally, those stats are only for article edits. For the stats for total edits, see here. --Matoro183(Talk) 12:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Just pointing out that it has been a week since i applied. Me_Potter_Fan(Talk) 13:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Done, but next time please take it on faith that we're following this, instead of sounding impatient. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 20:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I would like to request permission to get rollback privileges. I have recently become more active and have almost 800 edits. I have never done anything that is not trustworthy and I think that I have done a good job editing. Please consider me. Thank you.
Iluvgracie129 00:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Is it possible for me to have this rollback privilege? I am an active member since last month and contributed a lot, i admit that i also made mistakes sometimes but that's not intentionally and can easily undone... --ÈnŔîčö(Send me an Owl) 03:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Support: Good user.--Matoro183(Talk) 18:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Support: He has a good amount of edits, and seems dedicated to the wiki. GB57 21:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Is it possible for me to have a rollback prilledge. I am a very active member and I have contrubied nearly every day.
--Yeti222(Send me a Owl!)
Support: Great User! ---Yasmine2 02:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Support: Quite active. --Matoro183(Talk) 21:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Hi, I'd like to run for rollback. I've been editing for a little while, and I've done some reverting. ToonGanondorf(tc) 10:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Due to the inactivity of Me Potter Fan and Freakatone, we are conducting a vote to promote two new admins. Vote by placing your signature under your favorite candidate. Please read the voting policy before voting. The top two candidates will become administrators.
Only vote for 2 candidates. Voting will end 12:00 PM May 21 (EST).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I wanted to ask rollback rights. I may not be the best editor but the last time I've made big progress don't you think?--96ken(Talk) 18:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I'd like to think I've been fairly diligent about catching and undoing vandalism and fanon edits, and rollback privileges would be a big help. Nick O'Demus 23:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I spend a lot of my time here watching the RCs, and regularly revert vandalism. I'm an administrator over at Wookieepedia and have experience in deciding when it is appropriate to use rollback.
Grunny is one of those users who can be trusted immensely. I work with him on several wikis, and can vouch for his dedication and hard work. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 09:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would like to become a rollback. I have great experience in reverting vandalism. TurboGolf 07:22, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
I would like to ask for Rollback privledges. I dont know if I'm asking too early because Ive only been on here a little while, but Ive made some good contributions and I can be trusted. Ive also helped revert vandalism when I've seen it. --- Ratneer (Owl me) 02:00, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
May I ask for Rollback privledges? I've been here a while, and I think I've made some worthwhile contributions to htis wiki. I believe I've proved myself trustworthy. Thank you. QuidditchLover(My talk)(contribs) 03:20, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
I would like permission to rollback. --Hcoknhoj 18:57, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I'd like to propose Cavalier One be moved from an admin to a 'crat since John Reaves and myself have been relatively inactive recently. If no one has any objections I will be doing this within a few days. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 02:46, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
Well, I have no objections, but I would propose have a vote for cantidates, other than just Cavalier One, I mean I think Seth_Cooper and Starstuff should be in the running for it too. -- Ratneer Owl Me! 22:38, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
Strong support. Cavalier One is a user respected Wikia-wide, and he's helped build this Wiki into what it is today. Technically skilled with admin tools, and able to represent the Harry Potter Wiki community throughout Wikia. Having worked with Cavalier One on many other Wikis, I can think of no better candidate for Bureaucrat of this Wiki. Grunny(Talk) 08:40, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
This has been done. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 16:38, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I am nominating Grunny for administrator rights on the Harry Potter Wiki. Grunny has had these rights for a while now, as I temporarily gave him admin rights to allow him to work on cleaning up code across the wiki, some of which are in protected pages and namespaces accessible only by administrators. In that time, Grunny has cleaned up and reorganised templates and infoboxes to give the wiki a more "uniform" feel, and is to be commended for his efforts. I would like him to keep these rights, as I feel his presence on the admin team would be a benefit.
Grunny is a trusted and well respected member of the Wikia community at large, and a user who I have worked with over several wikis. His serves as an administrator and bureacrat across several wikis, including Wookieepedia. He is one of a handful of users who are part of the VSTF, who counter vandalism and spam Wikia-wide. Grunny is also technically experienced with Wikia operations and code, and can bring that level of knowledge to us, allowing us to benefit. Lastly, he operates a bot, Dr. Ball, M.D., which can make automated changes as needed.
In short, Wikia trusts him, and I trust him. If there are no objections, then I will allow him to keep the rights and make him a permanent member of the team. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 09:23, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Seconded. - Nick O'Demus 10:09, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would please like permission to rollback, as I have plenty of experience in reverting vandalism.--L.V.K.T.V.J.(Send an owl!) 22:29, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
I can vouch for LVKTVJ. He is a good editor and has made some useful contributions to the wiki. --JKoch(Owl Me!) 03:23, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
He's been a very reliable contributor, and has reverted many unhelpful, fanon, and vandalism edits. - Nick O'Demus 08:42, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
He's got a good eye for bad faith edits. --Cubs Fan(Talk to me) 15:20, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I nominate Nick O'Demus, as he has made many great edits and has been a vital source for this wiki.--L.V.K.T.V.J.(Send an owl!) 02:43, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Same,Also he is a great help if needed as he has one of the smartest brains in the whole wiki and the wiki would barely be made if he didn't contribute.Philered WAS HERE!
PEACE!
19:08, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I nominate Hcoknhoj for promotion to Administrator, as Matoro183 has gone inactive of their own volition. He's been extremely diligent about reverting vandalism and fanon, and in maintaining the quality of edits to the Wiki. - Nick O'Demus 20:23, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I nominate Grunny for promotion from Administrator to Bureaucrat, to maintain a presence of at least two active Bureaucrats on the Wiki. - Nick O'Demus 09:20, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would like to have the rollback button available for my use. It would be a great help, and I do believe I would put it to good, honest use. NimH 23:00, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
I vouch for him. --JKoch(Owl Me!) 02:37, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would very well like to have that extra rollback button. I'll put it to honest use. If anyone votes me, thanks.
For
Against
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would like to request the ability to Rollback edits, I feel it would be easier reverting fanon and vandalism, if agreed I promise to use the ability with a careful eye and honest intentions.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
EmmyG granted rollback rights.Grunny (talk) 06:16, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to request Rollback privileges, please-- I would definitely use it with only the best intentions, and use a discerning eye to kick vandalism and bad faith edits to the curb. Thanks.
For
Very good user, consistently helpful editting. - Nick O'Demus 05:33, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
Against
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Texthawm - I would like to request permission for rollback rights. I think I have a pretty good history. I have over 1,000 edits, and I'm pretty active on the wiki. I've never done anything to harm the wiki. I've never made any personal attacks on anyone. To be honest, I can't think of anything that would affect my request negatively. Thanks, --Texthawm
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Rights not granted.Grunny (talk) 23:19, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
I only see one edit to the mainspace. Please edit more and gain experience reverting vandalism here on the Harry Potter Wiki before requesting rollback again. Cheers, Grunny (talk) 23:40, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I nominate BachLynn23 for promotion to administrator. She has been one of our most active members, is consistently helpful to new users, and is a real asset to the wiki. - Nick O'Demus 21:12, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Texthawm 21:17, March 22, 2011 (UTC) Definitely a good candidate, very active, very friendly. She has worked very hard on improving this wiki, and I feel it will benefit a lot from her being made admin.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Rights not granted.grunny@talk:~$ 10:50, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
THE ONE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED
I would like to request for having Rollback Privileges because, I want to prevent vandalism and fanon from this wiki and I feel that it would be an easier way to prevent it. These are some reasons why I think I should have Rollback Privileges:
I have not had any warnings of creating vandalism or fanon to any wiki I edit on.
I have more than 500 edits
I get on Harry Potter Wiki everyday as it is my home page on the internet and every time i'm on I try to watch out for any fanon or vandalism.
I have not had any personal attacks on a user on any wiki before.
I would only use it if it was necessary.
I respect any decision you make toward me having Rollback Privileges.
Have a joyful day! - THE ONE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED Owl Me. 02:37, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to decline this request right now. I've looked over some of your recent undos and reverts and come across a number of ones that show inexperience at the moment. For example, this undo is incorrect, you did fix it afterward, but if you used rollback in that situation it would be a problem. Another example was these two reverts which reintroduced issues to the article. Another example would be here where you reintroduced fanon. For these reasons, I don't think you should be granted rollback just yet as you don't appear to have enough experience in determining what is fanon and vandalism (the only time rollback should be used). Please take more care when reverting someone's edits, and reapply after you have a bit more experience :-). Cheers, Grunny (talk) 09:49, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
I respect your decision. I think what I did on it was i thought i was getting rid of it but, instead I got it back on the page, but if you see the newer edit after that i made it go away. Thank-you for your time and, Thank-you for your advice, on having me wait more until I get more experience.
THE ONE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED Owl Me. 18:45, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I reverse vandalism every time I see it and it'll be a lot easier to do it if I had rollback powers. I think I'm trusted to use them by now... -HoboHunter28- (Leave me an owl!) 19:01, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Nick O'Demus 05:55, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
I do my best to be a contributing member of this wiki and dislike vandalism and the like with a passion. When I'm able to I watch the wiki and undo any vandalism I see as quickly as I can. Having rollback permissions would allow me to revert vandalism quicker and more efficiently than I currently can. I'd appreciate if the admins would consider giving me this permission. Thanks. -Shorty1982 01:25, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Nick O'Demus 05:55, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Due to extended inactivity by Hcoknhoj, I'm nominating Cubs Fan2007 for promotion to Administrator. He's been an active contributor for several years, has a history of consistently helpful edits, regularly cleans-up articles, is knowledgeable about Wiki policy, and fights vandalism. - Nick O'Demus 05:29, August 27, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Done. grunny@talk:~$ 22:36, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I'd like to nominate User:Speedysnitch for a chat mod, he has over 600 edits and is in chat daily.--BachLynn(Send an Owl!) 23:19, September 21, 2011 (UTC)
Done. grunny@talk:~$ 08:36, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
1337star granted rollback rights.grunny@talk:~$ 05:28, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
I would like to nominate User:1337star to rollback rights. He is an active user and contributions are really well. SpeedysnitchTalkcontribs 00:44, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I'd like to nominate Wind for a chat mod, I know he doesn't have many edits, but he is in chat a lot, and he is a Bcrat on the Hogwarts rpg wiki, so I know that he is both responsible and a dedicated user.`BachLynn(Send an Owl!) 01:37, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
I would like to nominate User:Head of Ravenclaw for chat moderator. He has 200 edits, and goes on chat often. He is also an admin on Hogwarts RPG Wiki. SpeedysnitchTalkcontribs 19:05, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Galina54 not granted chatmoderator rights.grunny@talk:~$ 05:40, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
It's nothing personal, but you need to have demonstrated a record of reliability and helpful editing before you will be entrusted with additional responsibilities. - Nick O'Demus 06:16, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Not done Per opposition above. grunny@talk:~$ 05:36, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would like to nominate Speedysnitch for administrator, with the decreasing activity of Matoro183. She is an active user, who typically edits daily, and is making the best of the wiki when possible.
I know Speedy on other wiki's and can vouch for the maturity and I see her editing here a lot and is quite helpful, I support this assuming there is in fact an administrator position available.BachLynn23Send me an Owl!The worst failure, is the failure to try. 23:10,4/22/2012
I think Speedy would be a fine administrator. Marktheseeker 21:54, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
Given her continued regular editing, I say yes. My only concern was the possible lack of activity and now that she's on here regularly, thats not an issue anymore. It'd be ashamed for this to be closed, simply from lack of voting. Come on, people, get involved! ProfessorTofty 00:02, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
Fairly active and a good editor. You'll hear no complaints from me! -- Seth Cooperowl post! 00:45, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
She's a very helpful editor. I think she deserves the chance. Harry granger Talk contribs 07:24, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
Against
Discussion
Do we know if she's even interested in the position? Her profile lists her as only "slightly active" at the moment, though she has in general been editing much more recently. Still, an admin, particularly one on such a busy wiki, should be someone who is reasonably active. Other than that, I don't really have any objections- her contributions are good and she's a chat mod, so she's already shown that she can be trusted with authority. ProfessorTofty 02:57, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
Speedy has accepted the nomination. - Nick O'Demus 21:57, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
I should've noted that I spoke with speedy on chat about it, and is willing to become an administrator. She is an rb + chat mod, is extremely helpful, etc. Head ofRavenclaw | Send me an Owl! 22:09, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
I'm extending the ending date for this nom til the 13th of May. Two votes really isn't enough to gather consensus for an admin candidate, so please vote either way. If no more votes are made by then, I'll close it as unsuccessful due to lack of votes. Cheers, grunny@talk:~$ 14:28, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I've been editing for a fair while and taking care of vandalism and such, and would like to request rollback to aid in doing the job more efficiently. ProfessorTofty 23:47, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
Support. Very good contributor: quality edits and efficient in undoing vandalism. -- Seth Cooperowl post! 01:10, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
Support. Many and good edits to the Wiki, well-deserved. Harry granger Talk contribs 09:05, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I would like to request admin privileges on the Harry Potter Wiki. I do believe that the admins we have do a good job, but they are overburdened - of the nine admins we have, three have not edited at all in over a month and of the remaining six, there are least three that have not edited within the past week.
If chosen, I would focus on issues of administration before making regular edits. Vandalism and issues related to off-topic blogs and such would be handled and matters that have been left sitting such as lack of movement on featured pages would be examined. The possibility of enabling new Wikia features such as badges which have not really undergone any sort of community review would be floated the community.
I believe my editing record is strong, and there are also my initiatives such as clearing out orphaned pages and supporting the notability policy. I also am currently the sole active admin and bureaucrat on the Eternal Sonata Wiki and since I took over earlier this year, it has moved from under 100 pages, many of them stub class, to nearly 250 pages, most of them full articles, and a featured Wikia wiki.
I will note that as stated in my profile, I do have another Wikia account. In case this is a concern for anyone, the account in question has not been used by me to edit on this wiki since before I registered this account, well over a year ago. I have my own reasons for not using the old account, but would be happy to provide the name of it if absolutely necessary to someone who asks for it, to be given in chat. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:54, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support: For all the above reasons and more; ProfessorTofty is a very enthusiastic contributor who, apart from all the excellent editing work he undertakes, manages to assiduously take part in every important discussion around, showing great responsabily and activity. He is also irreproachable (as far as I am concerned), when it comes to solving any problems that arise, and contributes to the good environment among editors. Definitely deserves (and I think we do, too!). -- Seth Cooperowl post! 22:21, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support: User is obviously invested in the community, has a high level of activity, and understands the way things work here as well as any of the current admins. -- 1337star(Drop me a line!) 22:57, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support: Is always the man who pushes things to a solution. The Wiki can only benefit from him as admin as it does already from him as user. Harry granger Talk contribs 14:31, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
Support: Most of the important factors have already been made and I agree with them all. He is one of the two most active users at this point and I think we could gain a lot from having him as an admin. Rainbow Shifter (Write to me) 15:00, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
Well, that's about a week now and full support. Okay to go ahead, then, or should we wait and try to get a couple more? ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:45, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Feeling far less self-conscious now, as I've been editing for almost a year and with almost if not no bad contributions, I feel that it's about time I asked for admin rights here. That way not only will I be able to quickly revert copious amounts of vandalism, but also I'll be able to quickly delete nonsense or fanon pages when other admins aren't active.
Hunnie Bunn, nothing personal, and I really respect all of the work that you've done around here, but I think that this may be a bit too soon. Recently you engaged in some troublesome editing regarding Gryffindor traits. There have also been some times when you've undone some contributions that weren't obviously intended as vandalism without leaving an edit comment or a message for the user in question. Also a bit of a concern is this whole thing about supposedly abandoning this account and starting another account entirely, only to then keep editing with this one. What I'd suggest-- request rollback instead, build up a good history with it, and then try requesting admin status again in a few months or so. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:19, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if I should reply here or on your talk page... either way, it's understandable what you're requesting and you're right about my bad behaviour in the past. Do I delete these messages and restore the page to the last edition, or do I just make a new one for rollback and archive this one, just wondering? Or am I doing the whole thing the wrong way? --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 00:25, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
If you'd like to go and withdraw this, then yeah, the second one-- just archive this conversation and open a new request for rollback. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:30, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I nominate Seth Cooper for promotion from Administrator to Bureaucrat, to maintain the presence of an active Bureaucrat on the Wiki. - Nick O'Demus 00:33, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Because I've had a few good edits over my year here at the wiki and to save time reverting vandalism, I am requesting rollback rights.
Seeing as I'm the one who suggested it, I certainly wouldn't oppose it. Has certainly been editing for quite a while and, while not perfect, has on the whole done a good job. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:49, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.