Harry Potter Wiki:Requests for administrator attention

Find an administrator

Before reporting a user here, please be sure that they have been warned.

Please add new incident reports at the BOTTOM of this page. Don't forget to sign your post with "~~~~", which translates into a signature and a time stamp automagically.

---

Archives:

• 2009
• 2010
• 2011
• 2012
• 2013

User:Hpotterf0r3v3r

User:Hpotterf0r3v3r is, as stated on his user page, only ten years old, below the minimum age limit (13) in Wikia's Terms of Use. -- 1337star ^{(Drop me a line!)} 01:42, January 9, 2014 (UTC)

Speedstinger011, or underage user?

If the statement on his userpage is anything to go on, this guy is less than the minimum age to create an account here, and his edits are not inconsistent with it. It's probably none of my business, and he's one of the quieter users around, but, considering the fuss I've seen on other wikis about such matters, I wonder what the policies are here. Thanks, MinorStoop 02:30, January 9, 2014 (UTC)

User:Jennyboom

This user left a hate message on the talk page of Hunnie Bunn. I thought he/she should be stopped.

He/she got already a warning from me: here.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 20:11, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Apart from the hate message, said user (who has left no gender with which to refer to them) has added fanon repeatedly despite warnings about the matter, and has repeatedly deleted said warnings despite requesting not to do so. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 20:21, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Jennyboom did it again today. Insultings on Hunnie Bunn's userpage.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 17:31, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

User:Aestes27

Aestes27 has been repeatedly adding fanon to the page Elder Wand despite several warnings on their talk page. I'm uncertain whether they simply didn't notice that they had three warnings and that their edits were repeatedly being reverted, or if they're simply ignoring all attempts to prevent their addition of fanon. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 19:49, April 6, 2014 (UTC)

Even after the blocking period was up, he or she continued to add fanonical (or at the very least highly speculative) informations to the page Protective enchantments. I have yet to leave another warning on their page, of course, but I highly doubt such would do much good. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 11:04, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for one week. Next breach will constitute a permanent block. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 12:52, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

I would say that Aestes27's contributions to Patronus Charms constitute a relapse of his fanonical activity. MinorStoop 17:18, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

Agreed, but it was only really the addition of his own patronus; the rest of his edits appeared to be in good faith. So I'll hold off for the moment, but if he adds obvious fanon again, then I'll block him. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 17:56, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

At first I would think it was mere forgetfulness or accident, but when coupled with his past edits, it is clear that Aestes27's fanonical edit today to Category:Wandmakers (on the same topic as his edits to this page) was intentional and with at least six warnings about fanon on his talk page it is clear that mere warnings have no effect. I therefore feel that perhaps a block of some sort may be necessary, although I will leave that up to the individual responsible for taking care of this issue. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 21:34, May 9, 2014 (UTC)

User:Jdogno7

This user is engaging in a series of edits, to various degree, incorrect, disruptive and useless, regularly reverted and rapidly causing his talk page to be filled with explanations, requests to stop, and rebukes by a number of other editors. I'm not surprised in discovering that early signs of this behavior go back to 2009, and as shown on said talk page, it holds true in at least two other wikis.

Any possibility to bring this situation to a stop? Thanks, MinorStoop 06:03, April 27, 2014 (UTC)

There might be a way out to this impasse without needing admin intervention - it might however take some time before we can see the results. If possible, I'd like to put this request on hold, at least temporarily. MinorStoop 09:59, April 27, 2014 (UTC)

User:Jenna4617

This user seems to be fairly persistent in both putting up her fantasies about HP on main pages and categorizing herself under inappropriate categories. I'm wondering if we could get her some down time? MinorStoop 19:14, May 18, 2014 (UTC)

By the look of it, Mrs Jenna needs some more down time. MinorStoop 20:43, May 24, 2014 (UTC)

Afraid that this character needs a longer time off - her fanon is back with a vengeance. MinorStoop 17:38, June 9, 2014 (UTC)

User:SaltSolutionPromo

A fairly nice case of vandalism, which might or might not be eligible for some downtime. Please, keep an eye on him on the next day or two. MinorStoop 09:20, May 19, 2014 (UTC)