Cubs Fan2007 (talk | contribs) |
Cubs Fan2007 (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:Even after the blocking period was up, he or she continued to add fanonical (or at the very least highly speculative) informations to the page [[Protective enchantments]]. I have yet to leave another warning on their page, of course, but I highly doubt such would do much good. --[[User:Hunnie Bunn|Hunnie Bunn]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|talk]]) 11:04, April 15, 2014 (UTC) |
:Even after the blocking period was up, he or she continued to add fanonical (or at the very least highly speculative) informations to the page [[Protective enchantments]]. I have yet to leave another warning on their page, of course, but I highly doubt such would do much good. --[[User:Hunnie Bunn|Hunnie Bunn]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|talk]]) 11:04, April 15, 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: Blocked for one week. Next breach will constitute a permanent block. --<span style="border: 2px blue solid; background-color: blue;">[[User:Cubs Fan2007|<font face="Gisha" color="red">'''Cubs Fan'''</font>]] [[User talk:Cubs Fan2007|<font face="Gisha" color="white">'''(Talk to me)'''</font>]]</span> 12:52, April 15, 2014 (UTC) |
:: Blocked for one week. Next breach will constitute a permanent block. --<span style="border: 2px blue solid; background-color: blue;">[[User:Cubs Fan2007|<font face="Gisha" color="red">'''Cubs Fan'''</font>]] [[User talk:Cubs Fan2007|<font face="Gisha" color="white">'''(Talk to me)'''</font>]]</span> 12:52, April 15, 2014 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :::I would say that [[User:Aestes27|Aestes27]]'s contributions to [[Patronus Charms]] constitute a relapse of his fanonical activity. [[User talk:MinorStoop|<font face="French Script MT"><font size="6" color="red">MinorStoop</font></font>]] 17:18, April 24, 2014 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::: Agreed, but it was only really the addition of his own patronus; the rest of his edits appeared to be in good faith. So I'll hold off for the moment, but if he adds obvious fanon again, then I'll block him. --<span style="border: 2px blue solid; background-color: blue;">[[User:Cubs Fan2007|<font face="Gisha" color="red">'''Cubs Fan'''</font>]] [[User talk:Cubs Fan2007|<font face="Gisha" color="white">'''(Talk to me)'''</font>]]</span> 17:56, April 24, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:56, 24 April 2014
Please add new incident reports at the BOTTOM of this page. Don't forget to sign your post with "~~~~", which translates into a signature and a time stamp automagically.
Archives:
User:Hpotterf0r3v3r
User:Hpotterf0r3v3r is, as stated on his user page, only ten years old, below the minimum age limit (13) in Wikia's Terms of Use. -- 1337star (Drop me a line!) 01:42, January 9, 2014 (UTC)
Speedstinger011, or underage user?
If the statement on his userpage is anything to go on, this guy is less than the minimum age to create an account here, and his edits are not inconsistent with it. It's probably none of my business, and he's one of the quieter users around, but, considering the fuss I've seen on other wikis about such matters, I wonder what the policies are here. Thanks, MinorStoop 02:30, January 9, 2014 (UTC)
User:Jennyboom
This user left a hate message on the talk page of Hunnie Bunn. I thought he/she should be stopped.
He/she got already a warning from me: here. Harry granger Talk contribs 20:11, February 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Apart from the hate message, said user (who has left no gender with which to refer to them) has added fanon repeatedly despite warnings about the matter, and has repeatedly deleted said warnings despite requesting not to do so. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 20:21, February 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Jennyboom did it again today. Insultings on Hunnie Bunn's userpage. Harry granger Talk contribs 17:31, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
User:Aestes27
Aestes27 has been repeatedly adding fanon to the page Elder Wand despite several warnings on their talk page. I'm uncertain whether they simply didn't notice that they had three warnings and that their edits were repeatedly being reverted, or if they're simply ignoring all attempts to prevent their addition of fanon. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 19:49, April 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Even after the blocking period was up, he or she continued to add fanonical (or at the very least highly speculative) informations to the page Protective enchantments. I have yet to leave another warning on their page, of course, but I highly doubt such would do much good. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 11:04, April 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Blocked for one week. Next breach will constitute a permanent block. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 12:52, April 15, 2014 (UTC)
- I would say that Aestes27's contributions to Patronus Charms constitute a relapse of his fanonical activity. MinorStoop 17:18, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed, but it was only really the addition of his own patronus; the rest of his edits appeared to be in good faith. So I'll hold off for the moment, but if he adds obvious fanon again, then I'll block him. --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 17:56, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
- I would say that Aestes27's contributions to Patronus Charms constitute a relapse of his fanonical activity. MinorStoop 17:18, April 24, 2014 (UTC)