Please read the Featured articles page before posting here for rules and regulations. For past nominations (promoted and rejected) please see the Former nominations page. For all new nominations please add them to the bottom of the list and follow the template given by the other nominations. In addition, please add {{F.A. Nomination}} Template to the top of all pages nominated to be a Featured Article.
Please note: only registered users may vote for Featured Articles. All votes from anon IPs will be struck in accordance with policy.
Nominations
Salazar Slytherin's Locket (2 votes for, 1 against)
- Support: I think it's a very informative and detailed article, that explains the purpose of the Horcrux... and the way it's hidden. --Freakatone 00:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It's missing a lot of useful information -- including sources of what books the locket is in, etc. It also does not conform to the layout guide. The history part is done well, but there is no description, appearances, etc. I think it could be improved. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 02:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support: I agree with the first vote, but I also think it should only be shown if the other Horcruxes are shown as well (at least the other objects belonging to the other founders).
Draco Malfoy (3 votes for, 0 against)
- Support: I think Draco Malfoy should be nominated because had it not been for his reluctance to reveal the identities of Harry, Ron and Hermione, they might not have lived. Gryff23 04:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Argument: Articles are featured for their quality, not because a particular character is liked or had a certain role in the series (see the Wiki policy on Featured Articles). That said, I think it's a well-written, detailed article, though I think it could use some more images (e.g. First Year, Inquisitorial Squad). Oread 04:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support: I think its a great article with lots of quotes. I really like the relationships section. The only thing that I would say is that it needs some more images. --Freakatone 11:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good article, plenty of quotes...— [M183] Talk 12:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)