Harry Potter Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Harry Potter Wiki
Harry Potter Wiki
20,678
pages

Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations

Revision as of 01:35, 23 September 2010 by Quickbuild2345 (talk | contribs) (→‎(1 Unspeakable/7 Users/8 Total))
View source
 
Featured articles nominations
      
Shortcut:
HPW:FAN


GSnitch

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best that the Harry Potter Wiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favourite characters, houses, or the like.

An article must…

  1. Be well-written and detailed.
  2. Be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. Be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. Follow the Layout Guide and all other policies on the Harry Potter Wiki.
  5. Following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. Not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. Have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
  8. Have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
  9. Be completely referenced for all available material and sources.
  10. Have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. Provide at least one quote on the article. A leading quote at the beginning of the article will be required only if there is quotable dialogue by or about the subject. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  12. Include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
  13. Include a "magical skills and abilities" section on all relevant character articles, especially for Wizard characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  14. Include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  15. Pass review by the Department of Mysteries review panel.

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organisation, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 2 Unspeakable supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article."
  6. Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once an article has a total of five votes, with at least two votes coming from Unspeakables and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the list and be officially known as a "featured article."
  5. No nominator may vote for their own nominations.

Also remember to add {{F.A. Nomination}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every two weeks, the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{FA}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{Featured article}} template. Nominations that are inactive with outstanding objections for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list by the Unspeakables.


Featured article nominations

Peter Pettigrew

  • Nominator: Thorning
  • Nomination comments: Very well written

(0 Unspeakables/8 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. --ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 16:46, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  2. --L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:29, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 16:58, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Wizard44 16:49 May 27,2010 (UTC)
  5. --Joeworthy 21:02, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --El Profeta Vespertino 22:10, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 13:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • This needs considerable work. In five minutes I have seen a dozen errors in grammar, poor wording, and british spelling. --Hcoknhoj 08:24, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
    • After making nearly 200 changes, it is at least grammatically correct and has improved continuity and storytelling. --Hcoknhoj 23:53, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
      • Anyone want to look through this one after me? --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 00:10, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
        • Get rid of the references in the introduction. It is a good article besides that.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 00:26, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
          • Reading just the Behind the Scenes section, I feel that this article may violate the Neutral Point of View Policy, e. g. Peter was untalented. McGonagall and Lupin claimed it, but it´s not true, as revealed by reading the books and the Magical abilities section.--Rodolphus 15:42, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
          • You said Behind the Scenes. I'll take a look at it. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 15:49, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nowhere does it say that. Throughout the article it says things such as, "Despite being called ____, he was actually _____." It shows up at least three times in the Article. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 15:56, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
            • The last point of BTS says: Wormtail is reciprocal of Severus Snape: Wormtail is a Gryffindor who is cowardly, disloyal, untalented, friend of the Marauders but disrespected by the Voldemort, while Snape is a Slytherin who is brave, loyal, talented, enemy of the Marauders but respected by Voldemort. Also, in their school years, Wormtail took pleasure in bullying Snape, while in their adulthood, Snape bullied Wormtail. Emphasis was added by me. It makes Snape sond like the best man ever. How can we fix it?--Rodolphus 16:21, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • We strike it for now. It is an unnecessary comparison as they are already compared above. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 17:03, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Definitely worthy of FA status, lots of pictures, detailed article with various sections and good referencing. --Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 13:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Potions master

(0 Unspeakables/2 Users/2 Total)

Support:

  1. --Butterfly the rabbit
  2. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 12:18, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Object

--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 21:54, February 21, 2010 (UTC) (Oppose vote struck under rule How to vote 2.1 "If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.")
--Wizard44 18:30 May 28,2010 (UTC) (Oppose vote struck under rule How to vote 2.1 "If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.")

Comments

Second Wizarding War

  • Nominator: Cubs Fan2007
  • Nomination comments: I think it's both well-written and well-referenced, and it has relevant images where appropriate.

(0 Unspeakables/10 User/10 Total)

Support

  1. Cubs Fan (Talk to me)
  2. --Thorning 13:00, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --L.V.K.T.V.J.'Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 02:07, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
  4. -- Slexie4eva 21:23, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Hcoknhoj 01:25, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!) 21:14, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --Wizard44 16:51 May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  8. philered 15:55, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  10. --Athletiger 01:11, August 1, 2010 (UTC)Athletiger

Object

  1. No sources or appearances. Jayden Matthews 11:46, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Grunny:
    • Everything needs to be sourced, so you need references for everything in the infobox and the article itself (except the intro).
      • There are still missing refs, for example, unsourced sentence at the end of the 1992-1993 section, and every item in the infobox requires a source. Grunny (talk) 04:13, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
    • Parts of this article are written in the present tense and per a recent vote, this needs to be changed to past-tense. Grunny (Talk) 09:42, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • --I've reffed the article. I'll try and get some specific chapters soon. I didn't see any tense issues, but if anyone see something I missed, be bold and fix it! --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 11:12, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Everything has been fully referenced down to the chapter by CubsFan and I. We have improved the storytelling telling and the accuracy. The English has also greatly improved. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 06:08, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • I am wondering whether the article is in American English or British English because I have seen spellings of both. --Athletiger 01:11, August 1, 2010 (UTC)Athletiger
    • Where are the American spellings? --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 01:15, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Elder Wand

(1 Unspeakables/8 Users/9 Total)

Support

  1. --Lord Voldemort killed the vampire James 01:25, January 12, 2010 (UTC)Lord Voldemort killed the vampire James
  2. Philered WAS HERE! PEACE! 21:00, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 16:58, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!)
  5. Unvote Grunny (talk) 23:18, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --Darth Jadious 09:21, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --BachLynn23 00:18, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 09:54, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Preliminaries:
    • Similar to the above nomination, everything needs to be sourced, so you need references for everything in the infobox and the article itself (except the intro).
    • Parts of this article are written in the present tense and per a recent vote, this needs to be changed to past-tense. Grunny (Talk) 09:44, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
      • Fixed both problems.--L.V.K.T.V.J.'Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 21:21, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
        • Good work adding some references, but there are still a few missing, for example the second paragraph of the history, and every item in the infobox must be soruced individually. Take a look at some of the Featured articles at Wookieepedia to get a better idea what type of sourcing is expected of quality articles. As for the tense, there are still a few instances of future or present tense in the article, i.e. "the Elder Wand does not ensure the victory of its master in a duel, nor render him or her invincible".
    • Another point, avoid speculation. Articles are written in-universe, so fan speculation should only be included in the behind the scenes section, and then, only if it is a widely acknowledged fan theory. So for example this really shouldn't be in the article: "(This may not be entirely true, as theoretically all one would have to do is disarm Harry by force as he did to Malfoy)." Grunny (Talk) 23:01, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
      • I fully referenced everything in the infobox and did everything you mentioned. Say something back if I missed anything.--L.V.K.T.V.J.'Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 23:47, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
    • For consistency, can you decide whether you're going to reference The Tales of Beedle the Bard (real), The Tale of the Three Brothers, or The Tales of Beedle the Bard? Since you use all three while referencing the same work.
    • I made various small changes to it while reviewing, let me know if you have any questions or problems with any of them :). Grunny (talk) 05:38, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
      • I think we need the "Beedle the Bard (real)" reference because of Dumbledore's notes, but if that confused you, I will make it more specific. Also, the changes you made are good. One last thing: I saw that you didn't cross off one of the objections above, so I tidied that up too. Thanks.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 14:52, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
        • It wasn't confusion, more just the inconsistency of referencing the same book three different ways ;). Good job all round :). Grunny (talk) 23:18, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 09:48, February 21, 2010 (UTC) Although a good article, it lacks subtitling and neatness, it seems a bit dense when you take a first glance at it. Could also use some more pictures.

Comments

  • We have gone through the History and separated the Myth from the reality and in general cleaned up the article. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 20:59, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Overall I support the article for nomination, just a question, both owners and masters are listed, but the only difference is Lord Voldemort, this is just a suggestion, I still support the article regardless, but would it maybe be better to just list the Masters on the info box, and then maybe reference that Lord Voldemort owned it but never mastered it somewhere in the article instead? Like I said, I support it either way, just a thought. --BachLynn23 00:18, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
  • I removed my objections, as all the problems have been rectified. A very good, detailed article with pictures and quotes. I also think it's one of the best referenced articles I've ever seen. Nice infobox also. Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 09:54, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Pomona Sprout

  • Nominator: Butterfly the rabbit
  • Nomination comments: I have recently rewritten the Irma Pince and Filius Flitwick articles and finished rewriting Sprout the other day. I believe it is of sufficient quality of a featured article.

(1 Unspeakable/9 Users/10 Total)

Support

  1. --Butterfly the rabbit
  2. Looks good.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 02:04, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Well done --ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 11:56, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Unvote --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 01:39, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Joeworthy 20:58, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!)
  7. --Wizard44 18:32 May 28,2010 (UTC)
  8.  El Profeta Vespertino  owl post! 10:11, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
    --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
    [[Your user page [.]|Raven Darkholme]]
  9. Jack5555 02:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  10. High quality. Ducky Mo Mo is my friend. 20:27, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. First glance:
    • Some unsourced areas. There should be no information that can't be referenced to an official source, so there should be no information without a ref tag attached to it somewhere. Examples: second part of "Early life" paragraph is missing a reference; Second paragraph (the one sentence one) in"Earlier years" needs a source; Second paragraph in "Sirius Black's Escape". I won't list them all, so just work through the article referencing all information and I'll take another look later :-). Grunny (talk) 04:17, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Rolanda Hooch

(1 Unspeakable/7 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. --Butterfly the rabbit
  2. --L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:51, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
  3. -ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 07:35, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Joeworthy 20:59, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Wizard44 14:14 May,29,2010 (UTC)
  6.  El Profeta Vespertino  owl post!
    --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --BachLynn23 17:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Unvote --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 21:44, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  9. Quickbuild2345 01:35, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Seth Cooper:
    • References. The article needs to be completely referenced. Furthermore the few references presented in the article are extremely brief and do not convey many information.
    • Speculation. Some statements on the article are somewhat speculative. Hooch being in Hufflepuff, for instance.
    • Quality of the quotes. The quotes are filled with links and the explanatory notes (the material between square brackets) shouldn't be italicized. Also, quotes from the narrator should be credited as "Description" and not as if a characted has said it.
    • Some sentences are extemely unnecessary and seem to be only in the article to make space for more and, (I should add) redundant links. One such example is: "and excelled at her Flying Classes in her first year, which was taught by the Flying Instructor." Seriously? I thought they were taught by the Potions master... --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 16:33, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  1. BachLynn23:
    • I don't see how the quote used at the beginning of the School years section, is relevant to Rolanda Hooch.
    • Shouldn't it say that she "may" have purchased her wand from Ollivanders or that she "probably" did? Just because most purchased their wands there, doesn't necessarily mean she did also.
    • In order for her to have been in school with Albus Dumbledore, she had to have been born between 1881 and 1899. Assuming she graduated at or before the Great War which took place between 1914 to 1918 in the real world.
    • Should there really be a picture (the one where everyone is raising their wands) on this page, if Rolanda isn't in it in the picture and it is only assumed that she participated in the battle?

--BachLynn23 17:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

      • I've changed it into what I believe is a better quote.
      • I've added "may have purchased". It is possible she bought her wand from other wandmakers such as Jimmy Kiddell, or even Gregorovitch.
      • Where is it claimed in the article that Rolanda and Dumbledore were classmates?
      • The picture is merely there for illustrative purposes. The picture is more suitable than, say, a image of Hooch in 1991. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 21:44, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Tom Riddle Sr.

(1 Unspeakables/8 Users/9 Total)

Support

  1. --L.V.K.T.V.J.'Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 23:19, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!) 3:19, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
  3. User:Exsiiron (Exsiiron (talk) 19:21, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Station7 18:08, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Unvote Good work. Grunny (talk) 04:03, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --Wizard44, 16:53 May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  7. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 08:05, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 17:12, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Grunny:
    • To start off, there are two unreferenced items in the infobox that need to be sourced.
    • Likewise, the second bullet point of the "Behind the scenes" section needs a reference.
    • Early life section:
      • You don't mention his parents in the Biography. Note that there should be nothing in the introduction that isn't covered in the biography.
      • "The Ministry of Magic discovered this, among other incidents, and presumably performed a Memory Charm on Tom." "Presumably" is very uncertain wording and suggests that this is original research which shouldn't be included in an article unless it can be backed up by significant evidence from a reliable source. So did they perform a memory charm or not? If so, what source clarifies that they did?
    • I'll continue reading it once you've handled these few objections. Good work so far, and sorry I took so long to get to this review! Grunny (talk) 04:24, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
      • I fixed everything you mentioned except the fourth bullet, as I don't see it in the intro, Biography, Personality, or relationships. If you can point it out to me I will gladly fix it. Thanks.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 01:09, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
        • It's in the Early life section of the biography, second sentence of the second paragraph: "When her brother Morfin noticed her interest, he hexed Tom with hives. The Ministry of Magic discovered this, among other incidents, and presumably performed a Memory Charm on Tom." I'll look over it again soon :-). Grunny (talk) 01:24, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • Early life – "made her play" is a little colloquial can you find a better way to word this? "While they were gone, Merope made her play for Tom."
    • The "Personality and traits" section needs to be gone over. It needs to be in past-tense just like the rest of the article, and you need to avoid speculatory wording and state only the facts. Words like "seems" and "likely" suggest original research which is discouraged in encyclopedic articles. Grunny (talk) 23:13, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
      • I could not think of a proper wording for the first objection, so I replaced it with foreshadowing for the next section. I also did the best I could on the other objecton.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 02:06, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
        • I reworded this for you. In encyclopedia articles it is important not to make your own assumptions as they will often be different to others. Articles should remain non-point of view and not have original research. So it is better to state facts and let the reader infer what they can from the info. Grunny (talk) 04:03, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Campaign to Discredit Albus Dumbledore and Harry Potter

  • Nominator: Hcoknhoj
  • Nomination comments: I think this article is well written and very informative.

(0 Unspeakables/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 00:03, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
  2. --Vengerer 08:01, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 16:02, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Object


Comments

Hogwarts Castle

  • Nominator: Wizard44
  • Nomination comments: It looks well written.

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  1. The article is in flux too often. It changes daily and does not have the consistency needed in a FA. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 22:00, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (Unspeakable only)

  1. Unvote Unaddressed objection for over a month. Grunny (talk) 04:18, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Attack at the Hogwarts Lake

  • Nominator: Station7
  • Nomination comments:

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments I wrote the overwhelming majority of this article, and I do not consider it of FA quality. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 11:27, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Salazar Slytherin's Locket

  • Nominator:User:Hcoknhoj
  • Nomination comments:Like Elder Wand, very well written and informative, perfect for the new movie season.

(0 Unspeakables/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 02:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. --BachLynn23 22:28, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • I have thoroughly referenced this article. It does need more quotes, if anyone wants to add some. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 02:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Aurora Sinistra (renomination)

  • Nominator: Rodolphus
  • Nomination comments: With her film identity recently discovered, nummerous additions and sources, I think the article looks better for Featured status now.

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

  1. Pol 871 11:15, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 15:40, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Non-uniform sourcing
    • Non-official sourcing (ie wictionary)
    • Too little is actually known about the character to generate a legitimate portrait of her life. Everything we know about is either derived from seeing her in the background of the films or hearing about her in the third person in off-hand sentences throughout the text.

Comments As far as I know, there are no official, sources for her ethymology. Should we move it Behind the Scenes, then? Or remove it entirely?--Rodolphus 16:00, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms
Advertisement