Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations

Please read the Featured articles page before posting here for rules and regulations. For past nominations (promoted and rejected) please see the Former nominations page. For all new nominations please add them to the bottom of the list and follow the template given by the other nominations. In addition, please add {{F.A. Nomination}} Template to the top of all pages nominated to be a Featured Article.

Please note: only registered users may vote for Featured Articles. All votes from anon IPs will be struck in accordance with policy.

Nominations

Peter Pettigrew (5 votes for, 4 against)

• Support: Well written, plenty of quotes and images.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 02:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Not completely sourced. If it is sourced in the future, then I will support the nomination.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Not refrenced, no list of sources, poor main image, none of the other images are sourced, and ones got a watermark. Jayce Carver ^Talk 13:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: I've sourced the entire article.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose: Does not have a relationships section or a personality and traits or skills section. Though the article in question has plenty of pictures and quotes, it is not thoroughly written and needs a longer intro.--Zupkem 10:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: per Zupkekm, but Pettigrew has many images. User:Timothyhouse1 12:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: looks good... Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 04:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: I feel that it need more information.
• Support: I think it looks good. It is a pretty good article with enough quotes and images. Iluvgracie129 01:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Looks good to me... although it could do with a bit more info I think. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 06:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Minerva McGonagall (8 votes for, 0 against)

• Support:Referenced, comprehensive, several pictures.AngelQueen 15:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Nice article, lots of info on a good character. Prissymis 21:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: A well-written article, plenty of information and well-referenced. Quidditch Lover
• Support: So be it.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It looks great. It is a well written article with good references and lots of excellent pictures. Iluvgracie129 17:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Well written, and good info on the characters.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spiceholmes (talk • contribs).
• Support:This article is well written, it has good photos, the character is also very good.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Canis Lupus (talk • contribs).
• Support:Great article on a really great character who deserves to own a featured article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rufus Scadalam (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Order of the Phoenix (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I recently did a massive expansion and clean-up of this article, and I lengthened the intro, separated allies from members, and added etymology, behind the scenes, appearances, references, and many images and quotes. Oread 19:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: It looks great Oread, nice job. It is a good article with lots of great pix, ect. I think it deserves a featured article status.Iluvgracie129 20:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Good article. It gives detailed information about the Order. It had complete list of the members even their allies. --You-Know-Who 04:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

First Year (0 votes for, 3 against)

• Oppose: No references. And it having too many images that had no-relevance to the topic. The article is for "First Year" (in general), not Harry Potter's 1st year... although i agree that it may help to describe the important events may happen during a First Year of a Hogwarts student. Another reason why i opposed is because it is not a general article to be discuss or has been discussed in the series unlike "Order of the Phoenix", i recommend "Hogwarts" article instead. --You-Know-Who 07:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose: Very cluttered with far too many images, not referenced, songs are not properly formatted, and "Harry's first year" section is sloppily written, with all kinds of grammatical errors. The person who nominated this article hasn't even given a supporting vote. Oread 15:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Sorry about the first year article but i am nominating a better atricle right about now.
• Oppose: This article is filled with grammar mistakes and too many pictures for such a short article. It is not the type of article that should be promoted to FA status. Iluvgracie129 01:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I decided to nominate a better article, as I write about this article at like 10pm at night!Yasmine2

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ernie Macmillan (8 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I like this article because it is very detailed.Yasmine2
• Support: I expanded the intro and added another image and etymology. I don't think we could get any more detail for a minor character. Oread 19:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: A great article indeed. Lots of details for a minor character. 96ken 12:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I think it's an awesome article. It surely deserves to be a featured article. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 05:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support: This article is has lot of detail for such a minor charcter. I love it! -- Yeti222
• Support: Great article. Can we get a higher-resolution image for the infobox, though?. ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 23:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support:This article looks excellent! ~Iluvgracie129 ^(Talk) 15:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: This article has lots of detail and good pictures, considering that Ernie is a seemingly minor character in the story. Margiechocoholic 08:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

House-elf(2 votes for, 0 againist)

• Support: I love house-elfs! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yeti222 (talk • contribs).
• Support: Looks like a pretty good article to me! Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 23:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support: Well written Yasmine2 09:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Alastor Moody (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think it's a pretty well written article. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 05:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support : Its a really good article - Moody was always a strong character too, so probable deserves a featured article. Hufflepuffrose 15:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I along with many other users put a lot of effort into this article and it looks great. ~Iluvgracie129 ^(Talk) 15:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Seamus Finnigan (1 vote for, 0 against)

• Support: Comprehensive, well laid out, and nicely illustrated. ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 23:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)