Wikia

Harry Potter Wiki

Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations

Talk10
11,849pages on
this wiki
Revision as of 09:04, November 22, 2012 by GeorgeWeasley16 (Talk | contribs)

 
Featured articles nominations
     
Shortcut:
HPW:FAN


GSnitch

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best that the Harry Potter Wiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favourite characters, houses, or the like.


An article must…

  1. Be well-written and detailed.
  2. Be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. Be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
  4. Follow the Layout Guide and all other policies on the Harry Potter Wiki.
  5. Following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  6. Not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  7. Have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
  8. Have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
  9. Be completely referenced for all available material and sources.
  10. Have all quotes and images sourced.
  11. Provide at least one quote on the article. A leading quote at the beginning of the article will be required only if there is quotable dialogue by or about the subject. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  12. Include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
  13. Include a "magical skills and abilities" section on all relevant character articles, especially for Wizard characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  14. Include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
  15. Pass review by the Department of Mysteries review panel.

How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organisation, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 2 Unspeakable supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article."
  6. Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once an article has a total of five votes, with at least two votes coming from Unspeakables and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the list and be officially known as a "featured article."
  5. No nominator may vote for their own nominations.

Also remember to add {{F.A. Nomination}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every two weeks, the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{FA}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{Featured article}} template. Nominations that are inactive with outstanding objections for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list by the Unspeakables.



Featured article nominations

Sybill Trelawney

  • Nominator: -- SaXon 17:14, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another rewrite

(0 Unspeakables/7 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Not my daughter you bitch! 07:12, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Neville Longbottom 08:56, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Head.Boy.Hog (Talk To Me) 23:07, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. THE ONE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED 18:05, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Ghjkl6 19:08, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Bertiebean 20:13, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 13:28, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
  8. *foreveryoung* 02:41, September 15, 2011 (UTC)*foreveryoung* "i suspect nargles are behind it."
  9. --Kyle Stewart (talk) 23:04, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Armando Dippet

  • Nominator: -- SaXon 21:19, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: After a lot of work, here is the result.

(1 Unspeakables/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. --Rodolphus 11:08, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Unvote --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 11:21, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
  3. R2-D2 (user) 23:23, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Lestranger
  5.  BachLynn23  Send me an Owl!  The worst failure, is the failure to try.  19:23,1/25/2012 

Object

Comments

Hermione Granger's mother

  • Nominator: -- SaXon 17:53, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another rewrite

(0 Unspeakables/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. German eagle logo  Firefox1095  German eagle logo 20:57, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
  2. *Ginny*(Point Me!) 01:01, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Confident this meets the criteria. ceranthor 12:57, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Peter Pettigrew

  • Nominator: Thorning
  • Nomination comments: Very well written

(1 Unspeakables/13 Users/14 Total)

Support

  1. --ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 16:46, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  2. --L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:29, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 16:58, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Wizard44 16:49 May 27,2010 (UTC)
  5. --Joeworthy 21:02, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --El Profeta Vespertino 22:10, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
    --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 13:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --Emmy () 19:49, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Rodolphus 11:07, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Happychickenvermin!!!
  11. Unvote No objections. All commenting users have voted in support. - Nick O'Demus 11:15, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
  12. XxScurryxX 20:47, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
  13. German eagle logo  Firefox1095  German eagle logo 02:40, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
  14. *Ginny*(Point Me!) 01:01, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • This needs considerable work. In five minutes I have seen a dozen errors in grammar, poor wording, and british spelling. --Hcoknhoj 08:24, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
    • After making nearly 200 changes, it is at least grammatically correct and has improved continuity and storytelling. --Hcoknhoj 23:53, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
      • Anyone want to look through this one after me? --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 00:10, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
        • Get rid of the references in the introduction. It is a good article besides that.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 00:26, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
          • Reading just the Behind the Scenes section, I feel that this article may violate the Neutral Point of View Policy, e. g. Peter was untalented. McGonagall and Lupin claimed it, but it´s not true, as revealed by reading the books and the Magical abilities section.--Rodolphus 15:42, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
          • You said Behind the Scenes. I'll take a look at it. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 15:49, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nowhere does it say that. Throughout the article it says things such as, "Despite being called ____, he was actually _____." It shows up at least three times in the Article. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 15:56, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
            • The last point of BTS says: Wormtail is reciprocal of Severus Snape: Wormtail is a Gryffindor who is cowardly, disloyal, untalented, friend of the Marauders but disrespected by the Voldemort, while Snape is a Slytherin who is brave, loyal, talented, enemy of the Marauders but respected by Voldemort. Also, in their school years, Wormtail took pleasure in bullying Snape, while in their adulthood, Snape bullied Wormtail. Emphasis was added by me. It makes Snape sond like the best man ever. How can we fix it?--Rodolphus 16:21, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • We strike it for now. It is an unnecessary comparison as they are already compared above. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 17:03, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Definitely worthy of FA status, lots of pictures, detailed article with various sections and good referencing. --Margiechocoholic Medieval Broomstick Owl me! 13:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • It was already in pretty good shape, but I edited some things and did what I could to clean up the relationships section. Seems like a pretty solid FA, to me, if that's still a possibility. Emmy () 19:49, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • I don´t supoort his betrayal, but the article should be NPOV per policy, and now it is.--Rodolphus 11:08, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Potions master

  • Nominator: -- SaXon
  • Nomination comments:

(0 Unspeakables/1 Users/1 Total)

Support:

  1. --Butterfly the rabbit (You cannot vote on your own nomination. Sorry!)
  2. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 12:18, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Object

--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 21:54, February 21, 2010 (UTC) (Oppose vote struck under rule How to vote 2.1 "If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.")
--Wizard44 18:30 May 28,2010 (UTC) (Oppose vote struck under rule How to vote 2.1 "If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.")
--*Ginny*(Point Me!) 08:09, May 19, 2011 (UTC) (Oppose vote struck under rule How to vote 2.1 "If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.")

Comments

  • No sourcings. If you're going to nominate an article, it should have sourcings so people can tell where the info is from. *Ginny*(Point Me!) 08:08, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Second Wizarding War

  • Nominator: Cubs Fan2007
  • Nomination comments: I think it's both well-written and well-referenced, and it has relevant images where appropriate.

(0 Unspeakables/11 User/11 Total)

Support

  1. Cubs Fan (Talk to me)
  2. --Thorning 13:00, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --L.V.K.T.V.J.'Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 02:07, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
  4. -- Slexie4eva 21:23, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Hcoknhoj 01:25, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!) 21:14, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --Wizard44 16:51 May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  8. philered 15:55, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
    --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Athletiger 01:11, August 1, 2010 (UTC)Athletiger
  10. Drummerwiz92 18:19, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
  11. German eagle logo  Firefox1095  German eagle logo 00:54, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
  12. *Ginny*(Point Me!) 08:04, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
  13. HoboHunter28 23:08, July 28, 2011 (UTC)
  14. Hpsuperfan 20:46, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
  15.  BachLynn23  Send me an Owl!  The worst failure, is the failure to try.  19:23,1/25/2012 

Object

  1. No sources or appearances. Jayden Matthews 11:46, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Grunny:
    • Everything needs to be sourced, so you need references for everything in the infobox and the article itself (except the intro).
      • There are still missing refs, for example, unsourced sentence at the end of the 1992-1993 section, and every item in the infobox requires a source. Grunny (talk) 04:13, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
    • Parts of this article are written in the present tense and per a recent vote, this needs to be changed to past-tense. Grunny (Talk) 09:42, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • --I've reffed the article. I'll try and get some specific chapters soon. I didn't see any tense issues, but if anyone see something I missed, be bold and fix it! --Cubs Fan (Talk to me) 11:12, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Everything has been fully referenced down to the chapter by CubsFan and I. We have improved the storytelling telling and the accuracy. The English has also greatly improved. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 06:08, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • I am wondering whether the article is in American English or British English because I have seen spellings of both. --Athletiger 01:11, August 1, 2010 (UTC)Athletiger
    • Where are the American spellings? --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 01:15, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • I personally have reviewed the article thoroughly and resourced those few unresourced senteces and even added a few pictures. I will double check it to make sure and also try to be more specific about the resources and source the chapters rather than the books alone. German eagle logo  Firefox1095  German eagle logo 03:25, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Pomona Sprout

  • Nominator: -- SaXon
  • Nomination comments: I have recently rewritten the Irma Pince and Filius Flitwick articles and finished rewriting Sprout the other day. I believe it is of sufficient quality of a featured article.

(1 Unspeakable/7 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. --Butterfly the rabbit (You cannot vote on an article you nominated yourself. Sorry.)
  2. Looks good.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 02:04, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Well done --ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 11:56, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Unvote --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 01:39, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Joeworthy 20:58, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!)
  7. --Wizard44 18:32 May 28,2010 (UTC)
  8.  El Profeta Vespertino  owl post! 10:11, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
    --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
    [[Your user page [.]|Raven Darkholme]]
  9. Jack5555 02:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Professor-Hagrid 02:13, September 19, 2011 (UTC)
  11.  BachLynn23  Send me an Owl!  The worst failure, is the failure to try.  19:23,1/25/2012 
  12. PeppermintButler77 (talk) 04:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. First glance:
    • Some unsourced areas. There should be no information that can't be referenced to an official source, so there should be no information without a ref tag attached to it somewhere. Examples: second part of "Early life" paragraph is missing a reference; Second paragraph (the one sentence one) in"Earlier years" needs a source; Second paragraph in "Sirius Black's Escape". I won't list them all, so just work through the article referencing all information and I'll take another look later :-). Grunny (talk) 04:17, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Rolanda Hooch

  • Nominator: -- SaXon
  • Nomination comments: I have recently rewritten the Irma Pince, Pomona Sprout and Filius Flitwick articles and finished rewriting Hooch the other day. I believe it is of sufficient quality of a featured article.

(1 Unspeakable/7 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. --Butterfly the rabbit (You cannot vote on an article you nominated yourself. Sorry. *Ginny*(Point Me!) 08:17, May 19, 2011 (UTC))
  2. --L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:51, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
  3. -ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 07:35, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Joeworthy 20:59, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Wizard44 14:14 May,29,2010 (UTC)
  6.  El Profeta Vespertino  owl post!
  1. --Lord David 23:40, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. --BachLynn23 17:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Unvote --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 21:44, August 16, 2010 (UTC)]
  4. *Ginny*(Point Me!) 08:18, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
    Quickbuild2345 01:35, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Seth Cooper:
    • References. The article needs to be completely referenced. Furthermore the few references presented in the article are extremely brief and do not convey many information.
    • Speculation. Some statements on the article are somewhat speculative. Hooch being in Hufflepuff, for instance.
    • Quality of the quotes. The quotes are filled with links and the explanatory notes (the material between square brackets) shouldn't be italicized. Also, quotes from the narrator should be credited as "Description" and not as if a characted has said it.
    • Some sentences are extemely unnecessary and seem to be only in the article to make space for more and, (I should add) redundant links. One such example is: "and excelled at her Flying Classes in her first year, which was taught by the Flying Instructor." Seriously? I thought they were taught by the Potions master... --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 16:33, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  1. BachLynn23:
    • I don't see how the quote used at the beginning of the School years section, is relevant to Rolanda Hooch.
    • Shouldn't it say that she "may" have purchased her wand from Ollivanders or that she "probably" did? Just because most purchased their wands there, doesn't necessarily mean she did also.
    • In order for her to have been in school with Albus Dumbledore, she had to have been born between 1881 and 1899. Assuming she graduated at or before the Great War which took place between 1914 to 1918 in the real world.
    • Should there really be a picture (the one where everyone is raising their wands) on this page, if Rolanda isn't in it in the picture and it is only assumed that she participated in the battle?

--BachLynn23 17:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

      • I've changed it into what I believe is a better quote.
      • I've added "may have purchased". It is possible she bought her wand from other wandmakers such as Jimmy Kiddell, or even Gregorovitch.
      • Where is it claimed in the article that Rolanda and Dumbledore were classmates?
      • The picture is merely there for illustrative purposes. The picture is more suitable than, say, a image of Hooch in 1991. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 21:44, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Tom Riddle Sr.

(1 Unspeakables/7 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. --L.V.K.T.V.J.'Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 23:19, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Scarletmoon579Ravenclawcrest(Talk to me!) 3:19, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
  3. User:Exsiiron (Exsiiron (talk) 19:21, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --Station7 18:08, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Unvote Good work. Grunny (talk) 04:03, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. --Wizard44, 16:53 May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  7. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 08:05, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  8. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 17:12, June 29, 2010 (UTC
  9. R2-D2 (user) 01:30, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  1. Grunny:
    • To start off, there are two unreferenced items in the infobox that need to be sourced.
    • Likewise, the second bullet point of the "Behind the scenes" section needs a reference.
    • Early life section:
      • You don't mention his parents in the Biography. Note that there should be nothing in the introduction that isn't covered in the biography.
      • "The Ministry of Magic discovered this, among other incidents, and presumably performed a Memory Charm on Tom." "Presumably" is very uncertain wording and suggests that this is original research which shouldn't be included in an article unless it can be backed up by significant evidence from a reliable source. So did they perform a memory charm or not? If so, what source clarifies that they did?
    • I'll continue reading it once you've handled these few objections. Good work so far, and sorry I took so long to get to this review! Grunny (talk) 04:24, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
      • I fixed everything you mentioned except the fourth bullet, as I don't see it in the intro, Biography, Personality, or relationships. If you can point it out to me I will gladly fix it. Thanks.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 01:09, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
        • It's in the Early life section of the biography, second sentence of the second paragraph: "When her brother Morfin noticed her interest, he hexed Tom with hives. The Ministry of Magic discovered this, among other incidents, and presumably performed a Memory Charm on Tom." I'll look over it again soon :-). Grunny (talk) 01:24, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • Early life – "made her play" is a little colloquial can you find a better way to word this? "While they were gone, Merope made her play for Tom."
    • The "Personality and traits" section needs to be gone over. It needs to be in past-tense just like the rest of the article, and you need to avoid speculatory wording and state only the facts. Words like "seems" and "likely" suggest original research which is discouraged in encyclopedic articles. Grunny (talk) 23:13, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
      • I could not think of a proper wording for the first objection, so I replaced it with foreshadowing for the next section. I also did the best I could on the other objecton.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 02:06, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
        • I reworded this for you. In encyclopedia articles it is important not to make your own assumptions as they will often be different to others. Articles should remain non-point of view and not have original research. So it is better to state facts and let the reader infer what they can from the info. Grunny (talk) 04:03, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Campaign to discredit Albus Dumbledore and Harry Potter

  • Nominator: Hcoknhoj
  • Nomination comments: I think this article is well written and very informative.

(0 Unspeakables/5 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 00:03, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
  2. --Vengerer 08:01, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 16:02, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  4. TheYellowUmbrella
  5. Canucksfan97 00:51, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Object

{C Comments

Hogwarts Castle

  • Nominator: Wizard44
  • Nomination comments: It looks well written.

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

  1. This article is very well written and is an important subject in all of the Harry Potter world. 
               -?????

Object

  1. The article is in flux too often. It changes daily and does not have the consistency needed in a FA. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 22:00, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (Unspeakable only)

  1. Unvote Unaddressed objection for over a month. Grunny (talk) 04:18, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Unvote Agreed. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 17:35, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Attack at the Black Lake

  • Nominator: Station7
  • Nomination comments:

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments {C I wrote the overwhelming majority of this article, and I do not consider it of FA quality. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 11:27, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Salazar Slytherin's Locket

  • Nominator: Hcoknhoj
  • Nomination comments: Like Elder Wand, very well written and informative, perfect for the new movie season.

(0 Unspeakables/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 02:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. --BachLynn23 22:28, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:45, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Grunny:
    • Looks good at a glance. Can you add references for each item in the infobox? Also, make sure references go after punctuation, i.e. "could open it.[1]" not "could open it[1]." I'll give it a copy-edit soon :). Grunny (talk) 06:21, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • I have thoroughly referenced this article. It does need more quotes, if anyone wants to add some. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 02:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Aurora Sinistra (renomination)

  • Nominator: Rodolphus
  • Nomination comments: With her film identity recently discovered, nummerous additions and sources, I think the article looks better for Featured status now.

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

  1. Pol 871 11:15, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Butterfly the rabbit
  3. Zannabanna

Object

  1. --JKochRavenclawcrest(Owl Me!) 15:40, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Non-uniform sourcing
    • Non-official sourcing (ie wictionary)
    • Too little is actually known about the character to generate a legitimate portrait of her life. Everything we know about is either derived from seeing her in the background of the films or hearing about her in the third person in off-hand sentences throughout the text.

Comments {C As far as I know, there are no official, sources for her ethymology. Should we move it Behind the Scenes, then? Or remove it entirely?--Rodolphus 16:00, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

[[George Weasley|GeorgeWeasley16 (talk) 09:04, November 22, 2012 (UTC)George Weasley]]

(0 Unspeakables/10 Users/10 Total)

Support

  1. --L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:46, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Happychickenvermin!!!
  3. --Darth Platypus 15:34, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
  4. BachLynnGryffindorcrest(Accio!) 14:08, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
  5. I.Heart.Fred.And.George 14:49, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Texthawm (Owl Me) 20:28, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
  7. German eagle logo  Firefox1095  German eagle logo 02:37, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
  8. PJizzletv 13:40, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Frozenyogurt. 11:53, April 5, 2011 (UTC)Frozenyogurt.
  10. Hornean --Hornean 03:27, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
  11. James Albus Severus Potter
  12. PeppermintButler77 (talk) 04:05, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  13. GeorgeWeasley16 (hence the username)

Object

Comments

  • If this article is promoted every article relating to the main Weasley family (besides Molly Weasley, which I will eventually work on) will be an FA. Nice little tidbit, I think.--L.V.K.T.V.J.Hogwarts(Send an owl!) 20:46, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Poppy Pomfrey

  • Nominator: Thorning
  • Nomination comments: Very well written, informative

(0 Unspeakables/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ƃuıuɹoɥʇ(Send me an owl) 17:49, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
  2. BachLynnGryffindorcrest(Accio!) 14:05, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  1. Needs more sources.--Rodolphus 17:54, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Pius Thicknesse

  • Nominator: --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 00:55, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I've recently done a rewrite and fully sourced the article. I think it is of sufficient quality to deserve a FA status.

(1 Unspeakables/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Bathilda Bagshot

  • Nominator: --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 17:34, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I've recently done a rewrite and fully sourced the article. I think it is of sufficient quality to deserve a FA status.

(1 Unspeakables/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

Object

  • Could you add a reference for her marital status in the infobox? Other than that, great work. grunny@talk:~$ 22:59, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified female Hogwarts teacher

  • Nominator: -- SaXon
  • Nomination comments: Yet another rewrite. Referenced to the extreme, with not-too-many images, I believe that this article is now of sufficient quality of Featured Article status.

(0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

  1. Seems to be rather well-written. It's obviously sourced well, so I see no reason to not support. ceranthor 18:14, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ZRSFizzyBongs (talk) 08:33, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Hepzibah Smith

  • Nominator: ceranthor
  • Nomination comments: I think this is a well-referenced and well-written article. I've tuned it up a lot over the past week or so, and I think that, while it's short, it's a great article.

(0 Unspeakables/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Peter Pettigrew

  • Nominator: Donut4
  • Nomination comments: I think its basically alright

0 Unspeakables/0 Users/0 Total

Support

Object

Comments

{C

{C

{C

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki