Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations

Please read the Featured articles page before posting here for rules and regulations. For past nominations (promoted and rejected) please see the Former nominations page. For all new nominations please add them to the bottom of the list and follow the template given by the other nominations. In addition, please add {{F.A. Nomination}} Template to the top of all pages nominated to be a Featured Article.

Please note: only registered users may vote for Featured Articles. All votes from anon IPs will be struck in accordance with policy.

Nominations

Dark Arts (2 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: Comprehensive, a lot of images and appropriate quotes, well-referenced. A bit different from most featured articles, too. Oread 19:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Like Defence Against the Dark Arts. Timothyhouse1 13:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: we had 2 days to go...... Timothyhouse1 13:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: I still need to try like above. Timothyhouse1 13:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: The intro needs to be much longer. I also think it needs a stronger main image, the images in the article need to be layed out better. Jayce Carver ^Talk 15:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Plenty of images and quotes. Well referenced. It would make a good FA -- Freakatone ^Talk 15:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I would just like to point out that the User Timothyhouse1 actually voted three times (2 supports, 1 oppose). Shouldn't all three votes be struck out in that case? Oread 16:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Good observation. I took care of it. -- Freakatone ^Talk 19:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Hannah Abbott (6 votes for, 0 against)

support: She isn´t as famous as Harry, Ron and Hermione, but her article is good written. has got pictures, a Relationships section and is well referenced.--Rodolphus 08:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

• Support: I agree. It doesn't need to be important, just well-written. ---- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 22:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: As per Cubs Fan2007--Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Seeing as how I did the article rewrite several months back, I'm all for it being featured. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support:I like the article for Hannah Abbott, she is very pretty in the movies, and the article is well-written. :) Prissymis 03:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support:I like the article it is very well-written96ken 10:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Peter Pettigrew (2 votes for, 3 against)

• Support: Well written, plenty of quotes and images.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 02:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Not completely sourced. If it is sourced in the future, then I will support the nomination.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Not refrenced, no list of sources, poor main image, none of the other images are sourced, and ones got a watermark. Jayce Carver ^Talk 13:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: I've sourced the entire article.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose: Does not have a relationships section or a personality and traits or skills section. Though the article in question has plenty of pictures and quotes, it is not thoroughly written and needs a longer intro.--Zupkem 10:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: per Zupkekm, but Pettigrew has many images. [[User:Timothyhouse1] 12:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

James Potter (4 votes for, 1 against)

• Support:Well-written and very important article.96ken 10:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Intro is not detailed enough. And the importance of the subject has no bearing on it's suitabillity to be featured. Jayce Carver ^Talk 13:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Well-written, referenced, plenty of images and quotes.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I've expanded the intro and added two more quotes. Oread 02:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: this is the same as then User:Timothyhouse1 12:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)