Support: I think it's a very informative and detailed article, that explains the purpose of the Horcrux... and the way it's hidden. --Freakatone 00:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Oppose It's missing a lot of useful information -- including sources of what books the locket is in, etc. It also does not conform to the layout guide. The history part is done well, but there is no description, appearances, etc. I think it could be improved. -- DarkJedi613(Talk) 02:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Support: I agree with the first vote, but I also think it should only be shown if the other Horcruxes are shown as well (at least the other objects belonging to the other founders). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.8.131.52 (talk • contribs).
Oppose Not sourced, grammatical errors...Matoro183
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.