Harry Potter Wiki:Featured articles nominations/History

This is a list of former nominations for Featured articles nominations. This is an archive of the outcome of each nomination (whether promoted or not). Please check this list before nominating an article.

Add all new archives to the bottom of the page.

Former Nominations

Luna Lovegood

• Nomination history

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

• Nomination history

Ginny Weasley

• Nomination history

Fred and George Weasley

• Nomination history

Charlie Weasley

• Nomination history

Bill Weasley

• Nomination history

Gryffindor

• Nomination history

Wand

• Nomination history

Fleur Delacour

• Nomination history

Percy Weasley

• Nomination history

Cedric Diggory

• Nomination history

Bellatrix Lestrange

• Nomination history

Viktor Krum

• Nomination history

Nymphadora Tonks

• Nomination history

Kingsley Shacklebolt

• Nomination history

Oliver Wood

• Nomination history

Hermione Granger

• Nomination history

Lucius Malfoy

• Nomination history

Sirius Black

• Nomination history

Triwizard Tournament

• Nomination history

The Burrow

• Nomination history

Neville Longbottom

• Nomination history

Severus Snape (first nomination)

• Nomination history

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Not Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 19:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Durmstrang Institute (1 vote for, 2 against)

• Support - A great article about a minor yet important location in the novels. - Dumblydoor 20:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against - Not enough information -Matoro183 ^(Talk) 20:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against - Not enough info.... Freakatone 23:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 19:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Cornelius Fudge (5 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I've expanded it and added some sourced quotes. But it could also use a few images in the body (as a side note, I don't currently have access to screenshot-taking software; a little help? - *nudge nudge wink wink*) But other than that, I think it's comprehensive and detailed. - Cubs Fan2007 20:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support Nice work! I'll see what I can do on the image front for you. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I've added a few images to the article, but it could use one or two more. I need to source one from Goblet, and possibly another from Phoenix. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
    • I've got my software up and running, so I added a few screenshots from Goblet. - Cubs Fan2007 03:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support -Matoro183 ^(Talk) 22:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support Seth Cooper 23:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support Freakatone 14:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

Rubeus Hagrid (3 votes for, 0 against)

Promoted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Support - A good article with many facts about one of the most important characters. - /Dumblydoor 15:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support - A very well written article, about an interesting character, with lots of pics. - Freakatone 22:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support - Well done. I like the relationships section. Huffleclaw 22:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Patronus (5 votes for, 0 against)

• Support I think that this article is one of the best about spells that we have. I like the list of known forms. --Rodolphus 16:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support I think that this is an important spell in the series, and it also shows a lot about the personalites of the characters in the list of known forms. --Freakatone 17:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support I like the article a lot Josh of Ravenclaw 22:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• support. looks like a very well written article.--UESPA 22:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support The article is one of the most comprehensive about a spell and put together very well. Oread 23:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. There's two facts that I found missing in the article. James Potter is not in the table of forms, and there is little mention about the ability to change one's Patronus. bibliomaniac₁₅ 02:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: I added James Potter to the list of Patronuses. --Freakatone 23:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Not Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Minerva McGonagall (2 votes for, 1 against)

• Support Minerva McGonagall is an important character and a major role in the Second War. User:Ahoskinson 95 24:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against Could still need some work...and you don't nominate articles just because the character is important...-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 02:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support I think the article is great. --Freakatone 17:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Not Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Seamus Finnigan (4 votes for, 2 against)

• Support: I've expanded it a bit, added some sourced quotes, and I've added some new screenshots. There are a few stubs that could be expanded in the biography, but I don't think anything that would work against it as an FA; since he essentially doesn't appear until Harry arrives at school, there's very little to include. - Cubs Fan2007 07:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Very nice article and a good character. I think that a student should be one of the featured articles. Wanekalily 13:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against: Seamus is a good character, but is not fairly important in the Second Wizarding War and is not a major character. User:Ahoskinson 95 23:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support An article is a featured article if the quality of the article is high...or the community just votes for it. It has nothing to do with the article's subject's importance...-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Remember, a character/place/etc does not necessarily have to be important to be a featured article. It should just be well written and in depth. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 13:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against I still think the article could be a little better. The relationships section needs expanding. --Freakatone 17:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support For someone as minor as Seamus, the article could hardly be any better.Yaquez 17:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Not Promoted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 15:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Molly Weasley (3 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: Molly Weasley is a fairly important character in the Harry Potter series. Some of you may may think: "Oh, she's not important!". She is. After all, she did kill Voldemort's best lieutenant, Bellatrix Lestrange. User:Ahoskinson 95 24:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against: I agree that Molly Weasley is a relatively important character in the series, but the article is not extensive enough, in my opinion, to be a featured article. It could use more elaboration. 24.141.37.177 03:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It's a good article, and I'm in the process of expanding the biography; any additional help is appreciated. - Cubs Fan2007 00:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Its a great article! She's a very important character to the book. Freakatone 00:41, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against No information past 1995. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 18:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Argument The info on Molly Weasley does go farther than 1995! Don't believe me? LOOK AT THE PAGE!!! User:Ahoskinson 95

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Death Eaters (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support Seems like a very good article if you ask me.Yaquez 22:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support I agree; it's a well-written article with enough detail, good pictures, and quotes from the books. Oread 23:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support Awesome article!! --Freakatone 00:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

*Support I love this article its awesome =) - struck as per policy, vote is closed anyway. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Not Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Dragon (1 votes for, 1 against)

• Support I think this is an excellent article, well sourced and written. - HP 23:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
• Against More than half of the article is just lists of dragon types and there products. There is not that much information in it. Freakatone 20:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the Department of Mysteries (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support I think it's well-written, very detailed, and has appropriate sourced quotes and screenshots. It's also an important event in the Second War. - Cubs Fan2007 00:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support I agree. Oread 19:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support Me too. Freakatone 20:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

• Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 20:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Ron Weasley (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think it's well-written, and very well detailed. And since the other two are F.A.s, I think it's only fair to have the whole trio. - Cubs Fan2007 07:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I definately agree, --Freakatone 11:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Good article, deserves to be FA Kentish121 09:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Its a really good article, it should be featured article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kanela (talk • contribs).
• Support: It was awesome! Extremely informative, told a lot about all different subjects and everybody loves Ron Weasley, so it only makes sense for him to be right there on the home page! I was really interested to read about all the different topics on the Ron Weasley page and it helped a lot in understanding different things. Since this is Wiki, everyone who comes right here can add the different ideas that they noticed about Ron and then I know about them too. Encore! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.219.170.50 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

Not promoted - potential is there, a little more work needed. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 11:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Salazar Slytherin's Locket (1 votes for, 2 against)

• Support: I think it's a very informative and detailed article, that explains the purpose of the Horcrux... and the way it's hidden. --Freakatone 00:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose It's missing a lot of useful information -- including sources of what books the locket is in, etc. It also does not conform to the layout guide. The history part is done well, but there is no description, appearances, etc. I think it could be improved. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 02:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I agree with the first vote, but I also think it should only be shown if the other Horcruxes are shown as well (at least the other objects belonging to the other founders). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.36.144.10 (talk • contribs).
• Oppose Not sourced, grammatical errors...Matoro183

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

{{{result}}} {{{sig}}}

Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Draco Malfoy (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think Draco Malfoy should be nominated because had it not been for his reluctance to reveal the identities of Harry, Ron and Hermione, they might not have lived. Gryff23 04:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Argument: Articles are featured for their quality, not because a particular character is liked or had a certain role in the series (see the Wiki policy on Featured Articles). That said, I think it's a well-written, detailed article, though I think it could use some more images (e.g. First Year, Inquisitorial Squad). Oread 04:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Support: I think its a great article with lots of quotes. I really like the relationships section. The only thing that I would say is that it needs some more images. --Freakatone 11:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Support Good article, plenty of quotes...— [M183] ^Talk 12:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I have added a few images, and I agree for the reasons others mentioned. Oread 05:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 04:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Dolores Umbridge (6 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think it's well written and detailed, and the images help out a lot. --Cubs Fan2007 04:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I agree. It has a reasonable amount of pictures and a great description of her regime at Hogwarts. Gryff23 05:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Yes, it's very good. -- Freakatone ^Talk 01:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support great pictures, important person, deserves to be a featured article—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtraii (talk • contribs).
• Support Matoro183^(Talk) 01:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support Well written piece of text that deserves to be featured. Good work, editors! --Cahill 05:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think the Hogwarts page is well written and has a nice description of the Syllabus. Gryff23 02:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

• Support: I feel this is an important place in the series. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtraii (talk • contribs).
• Support: -Matoro183 ^(Talk) 00:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Blood purity (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think it's a well-written, detailed article about a concept that is very important to the series, and it has sufficient quotes and images. Oread 04:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It plays an important role in the judgment of people —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtraii (talk • contribs).
• Support: Plenty of quotes!-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 00:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- Freakatone ^Talk 17:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Cho Chang(3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Plenty of quotes and images; in-depth look at biography, personality, and relationships. Oread 06:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Lots of quotes and dialogue-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 00:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Provisional oppose - Needs a longer intro section which should be a condensed version of the character's life. Also, I am concerned that the article focuses more on Harry' feelings and reactions to her rather than Cho herself. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Argument: I have lengthened the intro section according to Cavalier One's above point, as well as done some rewording so that Cho's interactions with Harry focus more on her than on him. Oread 15:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Support: good article. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 11:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 18:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Horace Slughorn (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support:I have put alot of hard work into this article, and it's completely unrecognisable from what it was a few days ago. It has a very good main image from the film, a long and descriptive opening paragraph, relevent quotes at the start of each section, a good descriptive opening quote, high quality images from the movie in the main body of the article, a well written and complete biography which is divided into appropriate paragraphs, no details have been left out the infobox, it has a personality and traits section, a physical appearance section, and a skills and abillities section all of which are very detailed. and to top it off all known sources and appearances have been listed. - –K.A.J^{•T•C•E•} 22:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support: you have worked hard and completely changed the article. well done! Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 00:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support - Nice images --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 00:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support Excellent work. I added some refs to the article as well. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 07:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Hogwarts (5 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I believe that this article is as good as if not better than Battle of the Department of Mysteries which is a featured article. I have expanded several parts of the article and think that it is ready to be a featured article Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 03:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It is the most importatn battle in the second wizarding war.Xtraii
• Support: Nice. --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 13:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support:I think that this is a good full article, and I think that it would be good to feature an article about a major event rather then an object, person or place. Palmala 18:44, 11 July
• Support: This is a very well-structured article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sammy12 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 01:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

House of Black (4 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: Oread recently cleaned up the entire article, and I added references. I think it's ready for featured article status. -- Freakatone ^Talk 12:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support:Great article. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 12:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I agree. Oread 22:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: It still needs a lot of information about the members Xtraii
• Support: The member's info is on their own pages.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 00:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 01:06, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Dementor (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Well written creaure page.--Rodolphus 15:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Very nice. Lots of quotes and images. -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Great pictures and absolutely awesome descriptions. All accurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Professor Adam (talk • contribs).
• Provisional oppose
  • Expand the intro please - there should be enough to fill the box on the main page.
  • I would like the article referenced and sourced as well. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 13:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Lots of quotes but Needs longer introXtraii
• Support: Excellent content, great images!
• Support: GREAT facts GREAT page OK intro AWESOME quotes MODERATE picture GRADE-B+(85)From, The Person Who Wrote This —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.243.123.158 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted. -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Potter family (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I've recently done a big clean-up of this article, and I think it has sufficient details, images, references, etc. I can't seem to find any suitable quotes, though... Oread 14:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: looks good. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 22:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Good work, an enjoyable article to read and return to {Darth Jadious 13:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)}
• Support: It looks good to me. -- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 19:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 11:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Dobby (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I referenced the entire article (with much trouble), and it has plenty of quotes and images. Looks good to go. -- Freakatone ^Talk 01:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It's a good article but might need more information on how Dobby tried to get Harry home. Xtraii
• Support: It looks good to me. -- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 19:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Good old Dobby! Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 13:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not Promoted -- Matoro183 ^(Talk) 10:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) (1 vote for, 6 against)

• Support: KH 02:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
• Against: Still a total mess, needs cleanup big time. It has the potential, but for now I just can't support. -- Freakatone ^Talk 12:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
• Against: I agree. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 12:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
• Against: I'm intrigued to know what made KH think this would be a suitable featured article in the fist place? –K.A.J^{•T•C•E•} 16:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
• Against: It needs clean-up but it would be a great one for later. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtraii (talk • contribs).
• Against: I agree, it's not quite ready. --Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 17:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
• Against: I agree. It needs more pictures and subsections. Gryff23 02:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- Matoro183 ^(Talk) 21:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Werewolf (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Good details, images, quotes, and references. Oread 16:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Looks good to me. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 02:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Nice. -- Freakatone ^Talk 02:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 07:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Polyjuice Potion (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Has lots of images and quotes, pretty detailed, has references, and I think it would be cool to have a potion as a featured article. -- Freakatone ^Talk 20:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: The intro could use some expansion, but other than that, it looks good to me. -- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 22:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I expanded the intro some... but it still needs work. -- Freakatone ^Talk 22:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support: For all the reasons above. I also expanded the intro a bit per suggestion. Oread 22:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Macguyver 9:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Fred Weasley (5 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I recently added references and etymology, so I think it's about ready now. Oread 16:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Very nice article. -- Freakatone ^Talk 20:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Looks good. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 01:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I miss Fred, so seeing him as a featured article would be sweet. KH 01:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Same with KH, really miss fred, and very, very well put together article.HPguru 04:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 15:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Lily Evans (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: A mother who has died before Harry Potter comes to school. Timothyhouse1 06:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Plenty of quotes, images, and references. -- Freakatone ^Talk 19:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I just added a Relationships section as well. Oread 19:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: good article. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 00:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 22:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Severus Snape (re-nomination) (8 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Headmaster in Deathly Hallows, DADA in Half-Blood Prince and the Potions in other books. Timothyhouse1 08:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I think it's ready to be featured. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 10:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Nice quotes, images, and references. I also added the expanded relationships section from the (now pretty much dead) Project Greasy Git. -- Freakatone ^Talk 11:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support One of the bravest / most important characters in the book. Great article, needs to be featured. ^^ HPguru 08:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Very good relationship section.Xtraii
• Oppose: I will support this article if the BtS can include that Tim Roth was offered the role before Alan Rickman was casted, but Roth could not combine it with his work in Planet of the Apes (2001, Tim Burton). I would edit it myself, but I don't like to edit other people's nominations. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Okey, it's added and, as I said, I now support the article. If I can do it after so few edits. ----Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I think the biography section could still use a bit of work, but overall, I think it's ready.

Oread 20:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose: I think the time line feels wierd, we learn everything about Snape in the same order as in the books but I think we should learn them as they happened to him. (First Dumbledore convices him to kill him, then he makes the wow, then he kills him. Not: he makes the wow, he kills him, then we find out it was already decided.) Thats how we learn about the other characters, and I know it's different with Snape because we didn't find out, for sure, until the wery end if he was good or bad, but it would be more interesting to have everything told, as it happened to him. This is about him, right?

Johanna 02:14, 18 September 2008 (CET)

• Support: It looks good to me. -- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 02:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 20:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Godric's Hollow (1 vote for, 3 against)

• Support: There are so many families in the wizarding world, such as Peverell family, Potter family, Bathilda Bagshot and Dumbledore family. Timothyhouse1 11:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: I shall not oppose to this nomination, but I would rather see the article with references and footnotes; a "behind the scenes" section including information on the filming and maybe precedents or similar places; and I would personally like to know if the subject (in this case Godric's Hollow) is featured in any of the video-games. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Lacks quotes, proper biography and references. -- Freakatone ^Talk 19:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: This is way to short and lacks some information.Xtraii
• Oppose: Same as above. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 09:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 21:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Pure-blood (3 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: Very detailed, lots of images, good quotes, references, etc. Oread 21:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I agree. -- Freakatone ^Talk 11:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: The books never say that Crabbe was a pure-blood.Xtraii

Argument: First of all, I don't think a tiny thing like that is enough reason to oppose an article being featured — especially since you can edit or at least discuss the issue if you think it's problematic. Secondly, it's highly likely that Crabbe is a pure-blood — Irma Crabbe, presumably a relative, married Pollux Black and is the mother of Walburga Black, and thus is obviously a pure-blood; otherwise her children wouldn't have been and Pollux would have been disowned for the marriage. Given that Vincent Crabbe is related to the House of Black, is the son of a Death Eater, is friends with a Malfoy, and actively served Voldemort during the Battle of Hogwarts (even if he didn't have the Mark), it's very likely he is a pure-blood. Oread 22:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support: Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 13:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
• Support: i aggree —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.229.40.129 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Horcrux (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Detailed, referenced, and a lot good images and quotes. Also, an important concept in the series and rather different from most other F.A.s. Oread 20:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: agreed. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 23:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I agree! Marfi236 12:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: -- Seth Cooper ^{Owl Post} 22:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 00:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Battle over Little Whinging (4 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: A battle which kills Hedwig, the snowy owl and also Alastor Moody. Harry Potter will be taken out of Little Whinging. Timothyhouse1 11:19, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: No list of sources or appearances, no refrences, not very detailed. Darth Dessicas 19:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: I added the appearances, and there are references.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• Support: Good but needs a behind the scenes and needs to be longer.Xtraii
• Support: I'm still a little iffy on this article being featured, but until the Deathly Hallows film comes out (allowing us to have more images and material for a behind the scenes section), I don't think it could be any better. Oread 19:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Per Oread. -- Freakatone ^Talk 11:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 13:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Hannah Abbott (6 votes for, 0 against)

support: She isn´t as famous as Harry, Ron and Hermione, but her article is good written. has got pictures, a Relationships section and is well referenced.--Rodolphus 08:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

• Support: I agree. It doesn't need to be important, just well-written. ---- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 22:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: As per Cubs Fan2007--Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Seeing as how I did the article rewrite several months back, I'm all for it being featured. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support:I like the article for Hannah Abbott, she is very pretty in the movies, and the article is well-written. :) Prissymis 03:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support:I like the article it is very well-written96ken 10:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 12:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

James Potter (4 votes for, 1 against)

• Support:Well-written and very important article.96ken 10:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Intro is not detailed enough. And the importance of the subject has no bearing on it's suitabillity to be featured. Jayce Carver ^Talk 13:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: I've expanded the intro and added two more quotes. Oread 02:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: this is the same as then User:Timothyhouse1 12:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: The article in question has a good intro, plenty of quotes and pictures, an excellent "at-a-glance" character information box, a relationships section, a physical appearance section and a personality and traits section. Zupkem 09:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It's obvious that it is a well written article. It has lots of well selected quotes and photos. It also has a lot of information already in the biographical information box. Waterdrop95 05:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 21:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Dark Arts (5 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: Comprehensive, a lot of images and appropriate quotes, well-referenced. A bit different from most featured articles, too. Oread 19:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Like Defence Against the Dark Arts. Timothyhouse1 13:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: we had 2 days to go...... Timothyhouse1 13:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: I still need to try like above. Timothyhouse1 13:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: The intro needs to be much longer. I also think it needs a stronger main image, the images in the article need to be layed out better. Jayce Carver ^Talk 15:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Plenty of images and quotes. Well referenced. It would make a good FA -- Freakatone ^Talk 15:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I would just like to point out that the User Timothyhouse1 actually voted three times (2 supports, 1 oppose). Shouldn't all three votes be struck out in that case? Oread 16:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Good observation. I took care of it. -- Freakatone ^Talk 19:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

• Support: The articles are well detailed with images of each of the examples of Dark Magic. The actual information is also detailed as well. It has lots of links on Dark wizards. Waterdrop95 05:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Looks good to me. ---- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 04:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

*Support: It's a well written article, needs a little more, but it's still good.

• Support: I agree completely. It looks real good and has a good article. Gryff23 19:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Minerva McGonagall (8 votes for, 0 against)

• Support:Referenced, comprehensive, several pictures.AngelQueen 15:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Nice article, lots of info on a good character. Prissymis 21:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: A well-written article, plenty of information and well-referenced. Quidditch Lover
• Support: So be it.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Support: It looks great. It is a well written article with good references and lots of excellent pictures. Iluvgracie129 17:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Well written, and good info on the characters.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spiceholmes (talk • contribs).
• Support:This article is well written, it has good photos, the character is also very good.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Canis Lupus (talk • contribs).
• Support:Great article on a really great character who deserves to own a featured article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rufus Scadalam (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Order of the Phoenix (3 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I recently did a massive expansion and clean-up of this article, and I lengthened the intro, separated allies from members, and added etymology, behind the scenes, appearances, references, and many images and quotes. Oread 19:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: It looks great Oread, nice job. It is a good article with lots of great pix, ect. I think it deserves a featured article status.Iluvgracie129 20:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Good article. It gives detailed information about the Order. It had complete list of the members even their allies. --You-Know-Who 04:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

First Year (0 votes for, 3 against)

• Oppose: No references. And it having too many images that had no-relevance to the topic. The article is for "First Year" (in general), not Harry Potter's 1st year... although i agree that it may help to describe the important events may happen during a First Year of a Hogwarts student. Another reason why i opposed is because it is not a general article to be discuss or has been discussed in the series unlike "Order of the Phoenix", i recommend "Hogwarts" article instead. --You-Know-Who 07:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose: Very cluttered with far too many images, not referenced, songs are not properly formatted, and "Harry's first year" section is sloppily written, with all kinds of grammatical errors. The person who nominated this article hasn't even given a supporting vote. Oread 15:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Sorry about the first year article but i am nominating a better atricle right about now.
• Oppose: This article is filled with grammar mistakes and too many pictures for such a short article. It is not the type of article that should be promoted to FA status. Iluvgracie129 01:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I decided to nominate a better article, as I write about this article at like 10pm at night!Yasmine2

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 21:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Ernie Macmillan (8 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I like this article because it is very detailed.Yasmine2
• Support: I expanded the intro and added another image and etymology. I don't think we could get any more detail for a minor character. Oread 19:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: A great article indeed. Lots of details for a minor character. 96ken 12:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I think it's an awesome article. It surely deserves to be a featured article. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 05:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support: This article is has lot of detail for such a minor charcter. I love it! -- Yeti222
• Support: Great article. Can we get a higher-resolution image for the infobox, though?. ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 23:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support:This article looks excellent! ~Iluvgracie129 ^(Talk) 15:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: This article has lots of detail and good pictures, considering that Ernie is a seemingly minor character in the story. Margiechocoholic 08:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not promoted Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Peter Pettigrew (6 votes for, 5 against)

• Support: Well written, plenty of quotes and images.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 02:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Not completely sourced. If it is sourced in the future, then I will support the nomination.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: Not refrenced, no list of sources, poor main image, none of the other images are sourced, and ones got a watermark. Jayce Carver ^Talk 13:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: I've sourced the entire article.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose: Does not have a relationships section or a personality and traits or skills section. Though the article in question has plenty of pictures and quotes, it is not thoroughly written and needs a longer intro.--Zupkem 10:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: per Zupkekm, but Pettigrew has many images. User:Timothyhouse1 12:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: looks good... Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 04:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: I feel that it need more information.
• Support: I think it looks good. It is a pretty good article with enough quotes and images. Iluvgracie129 01:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Looks good to me... although it could do with a bit more info I think. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 06:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

• Oppose: add a relationships section and maybe. TSSD
• Support Good article. A lot of detailed information. --- harrypotterthegreat ^{(Owl Me!)}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

House-elf(5 votes for, 0 againist)

• Support: Cool article! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yeti222 (talk • contribs).
• Support: Looks like a pretty good article to me! Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 23:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support: Well written Yasmine2 09:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Good article and well writtten --KristiannaEl 05:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support Well written. --- harrypotterthegreat ^{(Owl Me!)}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Alastor Moody (6 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: I think it's a pretty well written article. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)}

(contributions) 05:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

• Support : Its a really good article - Moody was always a strong character too, so probable deserves a featured article. Hufflepuffrose 15:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I along with many other users put a lot of effort into this article and it looks great. ~Iluvgracie129 ^(Talk) 15:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support :I totally agree. Very good article! 96ken 19:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: It looks good to me. --Cubs Fan2007 ^{(Message me)} 06:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support Looks great! --- harrypotterthegreat ^{(Owl Me!)}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Seamus Finnigan (5 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Comprehensive, well laid out, and nicely illustrated. ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 23:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: A great article indeed. It has to become a featured article! 96ken 19:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Excellent article, looks very nice!~Iluvgracie129 ^(Talk) 18:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Very detailed and well-written. --Cubs Fan2007 ^{(Message me)} 06:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support I agree with Starstuff. --- harrypotterthegreat ^{(Owl Me!)}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 14:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Arthur Weasley (9 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Excellent article! --- Yeti222 ^{(Owl Me!)}
• Support: It's very well-written, and has some great supporting images. --Cubs Fan2007 ^{(Message me)} 06:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Arthur is a great character and the article is full of good information--KristiannaEl 05:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support Sure. --- harrypotterthegreat ^{(Owl Me!)}
• Support: I lengthened the intro and added a physical appearance section and references. It could still use a relationships section, though. Oread ^(talk) 00:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Great Article --- Yasmine2 02:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Good, detailed, great pictures -- Hellabore
• Support: Nice one. ––ÈnŔîčö^{(Send me an Owl)} 14:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Suppoer: Great article, full of fantastic information, quotes and images. It has everything you'd ask for in a featured article --- Margiechocoholic 08:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 14:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Bartemius Crouch Jr. (7 vote for, 0 against)

• Support: I recently fully referenced this article, added quotes and appearance, behind the scenes, and personality sections, and expanded the intro. Yeti222 added some great images and someone else added a magical skills section. Oread ^(talk) 18:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support:I think this article is very good, and I have added some images with it ---Yeti222 ^{(Owl Me!)}
• Support Good. --- harrypotterthegreat ^{(Owl Me!)}
• Support: I´ve been among those who wrote the skills section and I´m supporting the article--Rodolphus 17:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Great Article --- Yasmine2 02:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Sure -- Hellabore 07:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I like this character -- You-Know-Who

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 14:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Muggle (6 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Realy good article --Hellabore
• Support: Sure -- Yasmine2 07:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Great Article, loads of pictures -- Yeti222 ^{(Owl Me!)}
• Support: Seeing as I rewrote this article some time ago, and other contributors have added to it since then, I'm all for it being featured. Oread ^(talk) 15:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I really like this article mainly because of the photos (and video) that it contains and the wonderful quotes that accompany the sub-chapters of it. I also would like to see this become a featured article because it is not, as it normally is with these, just about a main character in the series. Well done. Margiechocoholic 11:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: I voted for it because it's such a nice article, and bcoz i belong on this society... :) --ÈnŔîčö^{(Send me an Owl)} 08:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 20:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Aragog (4 votes for, 0 against)

• Support: Short, but accurate.Aragog the Acromantula^{(Talk / Contributions)} 20:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

• Support: Great article .... many great pictures... I added one myself -- Hellabore
• Support: Well written article, and some great supporting pictures. --Cubs Fan2007 ^{(Message me)} 04:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Nicely done. --ÈnŔîčö^{(Send me an Owl)} 05:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.