The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 10:20, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Gilderoy Lockhart (+4)

• Support: Seems like a pretty good article to me. Quidditch Lover ^{(My talk)(contribs)} 04:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Fairly well written and informative. ShirleyA^{(The Quibbler)} 09:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Great pictures, a lot of useful information. --Profiteor ^{(Owl Me)} 19:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
• Support: Good pics , tons of info , it flows together awesome Okapi. 06:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Does not meet voting policy criteria.
• Support: Although it has great images and information, it lacks a relationships section, and the "Hogwarts Professor" sub-category could do with a but more sub-titling so that it isn't quite as daunting. --Margiechocoholic ^{Owl me!} 08:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Margiechocoholic are you actually supporting the FA nomination for Lockhart? Your vote says you are but your explanation next to it seems to be negative against it being FA. Patr0nus ^{( Expecto Patronum! )} 23:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

• Support: I think that this is a good, informational article to feature! -gpotterdancer

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.