Support: Great article, but it focuses a little too much on Harry, Ron, and Hermione, and not the subject of first years. But that's my only complaint.- Aragog the Acromantula(Talk / Contributions) 19:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Provisional Oppose: It has a lot of potential, but, as mentioned above, it focuses more on Harry than on first-years in general. Also, the events of Harry's first year are described in present tense. There are also a fair amount of grammatical errors, excessive linking, and no references. It isn't ready for featured status at present. Oread(talk) 14:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose: None of the problems I mentioned above have been fixed, and the intro is much too short. Oread(talk) 18:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose: Poorly written, not sourced. The entire section Harry's first year should not exist, except for maybe a paragraph or two of info, as it belongs in his article. Without this section, there really is nothing to merit anything close to an FA.--Matoro183(Talk) 00:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.