- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not Promoted --Matoro183 (Talk) 01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
First year (0 votes for, 3 against) (First nomination)
- Oppose: No references. And it having too many images that had no-relevance to the topic. The article is for "First Year" (in general), not Harry Potter's 1st year... although i agree that it may help to describe the important events may happen during a First Year of a Hogwarts student. Another reason why i opposed is because it is not a general article to be discuss or has been discussed in the series unlike "Order of the Phoenix", i recommend "Hogwarts" article instead. --You-Know-Who 07:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: Very cluttered with far too many images, not referenced, songs are not properly formatted, and "Harry's first year" section is sloppily written, with all kinds of grammatical errors. The person who nominated this article hasn't even given a supporting vote. Oread 15:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry about the first year article but i am nominating a better atricle right about now.
- Oppose: This article is filled with grammar mistakes and too many pictures for such a short article. It is not the type of article that should be promoted to FA status. Iluvgracie129 01:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
I decided to nominate a better article, as I write about this article at like 10pm at night!Yasmine2
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not Promoted -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 15:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
First year (3 votes for, 2 against) (re-nomination)
- Support: Added quotes, cleaned up, added images, and new sections --- Hellabore (Send me an Owl)(contribs)
- Support: Great article, but it focuses a little too much on Harry, Ron, and Hermione, and not the subject of first years. But that's my only complaint.- Aragog the Acromantula(Talk / Contributions) 19:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support: ÈnRîcö (Send me an Owl) 15:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Provisional Oppose: It has a lot of potential, but, as mentioned above, it focuses more on Harry than on first-years in general. Also, the events of Harry's first year are described in present tense. There are also a fair amount of grammatical errors, excessive linking, and no references. It isn't ready for featured status at present. Oread (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: None of the problems I mentioned above have been fixed, and the intro is much too short. Oread (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: Poorly written, not sourced. The entire section Harry's first year should not exist, except for maybe a paragraph or two of info, as it belongs in his article. Without this section, there really is nothing to merit anything close to an FA.--Matoro183 (Talk) 00:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.