The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Promoted --Matoro183 ^(Talk) 21:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Dark Arts (5 votes for, 1 against)

• Support: Comprehensive, a lot of images and appropriate quotes, well-referenced. A bit different from most featured articles, too. Oread 19:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Like Defence Against the Dark Arts. Timothyhouse1 13:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Support: we had 2 days to go...... Timothyhouse1 13:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: I still need to try like above. Timothyhouse1 13:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose: The intro needs to be much longer. I also think it needs a stronger main image, the images in the article need to be layed out better. Jayce Carver ^Talk 15:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Plenty of images and quotes. Well referenced. It would make a good FA -- Freakatone ^Talk 15:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I would just like to point out that the User Timothyhouse1 actually voted three times (2 supports, 1 oppose). Shouldn't all three votes be struck out in that case? Oread 16:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Good observation. I took care of it. -- Freakatone ^Talk 19:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

• Support: The articles are well detailed with images of each of the examples of Dark Magic. The actual information is also detailed as well. It has lots of links on Dark wizards. Waterdrop95 05:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support: Looks good to me. ---- Cubs Fan2007 ^(Talk) 04:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

*Support: It's a well written article, needs a little more, but it's still good.

• Support: I agree completely. It looks real good and has a good article. Gryff23 19:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.