I have rescently noticed that all Wand articles are using the object infobox. Wouldn´t a wand infobox be useful? My fiest idea is:

|name: e. g. Elder Wand

|File: maxium 250 pix

|manufacturer: Olivander or Gregorowitch

|made: Year in which the wand was made

|master(s):

|wood:

|core:

|length

|characteristics

Behind the Scenes

|First appearance

|Latest appearance

|Last appearance

i´m not sure about the colors: I would tend to dark brown and white, like wand wood.

What do you think? --Rodolphus 14:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I would be in favour of it. We have enough articles about wands to merit their own infoboxes, I think. Oread ^(talk) 17:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The behind the scenes section would not be included, but apart from that it's a good idea. The current object battle and organization infoboxes need to be re-done to match the individual ones. Jayce Carver ^Talk 18:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The event infoboxes need to have the behind the scenes sections removed as well. Oread ^(talk) 19:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The location, potions and objects infoboxes still have the behind the scenes too. -- Seth Cooper ^{(Owl Post)} 21:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I think that this is a great idea. The wizard individual infobox currently uses a chocolate/ash brown colour combination, so if we are going to go with wood tones for the wand infobox, I'd suggest something along the lines of mahogony or birch. ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 01:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Also while were on the subject of infoboxes, does anyone else think there should be a conflit infobox for the wars themselves rather than using battle infoboxes? Jayce Carver ^Talk 10:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I would like the birch colour. If someone agrees and creates the template, I would replace the object box on the wand pages with it.--Rodolphus 12:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I created it under Template:Wand infobox. I don't like the color scheme, though - feel free to change them! -- Seth Cooper ^{(Owl Post)} 14:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

All infoboxes have been replaced, as far as I can see, but the "characteristics part isn´t shown in the articles. Is that a mistake?--Rodolphus 15:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

The "characteristics" section is for those adjectives Ollivander uses to give to wands, like "springy", "swishy", or "Good for Charmwork. -- Seth Cooper ^{(Owl Post)} 15:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

You have made a mistake here...neither Olivander nor Gregorvitch made the Elder Wand. It should be Maker: Death or Peverall Brother(s) -Aidan

You´re right. It was just an example.--Rodolphus 08:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)